Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 944382, member: 1969"] I'm confused - you like the efficiency rankings, but don't like teams measured by net efficiency? He is ranking teams in terms of net efficiency (adjusting for schedule). [B]That is all he is doing. [/B] Its a simple way to rank 351 teams. And its an effective way to get a range of where a team is at. The problem occurs when people want his rankings to be done the same way as the AP does them, and somehow do it for all 351 teams. I am one of the Pomeroy backers here, but I can definitely tell you I have never said one team is better because they are ranked one, two, three, four or five spots higher than somebody else. . [/QUOTE]