Eric15
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 30,084
- Like
- 112,209
Sure, it's a given that these are just opinions. The "necessary" was meant to refer to McNamara's 2,000-whatever, rather than statistics themselves, because many of the players already honored didn't accumulate (or score or earn) as many points. It's my opinion that one doesn't need X number of career points and doesn't need to be ranked in the top Y of any statistical category to be included. And Sidat-Singh shows that stats really aren't necessary.
I agree that there's an intangible that seems to be the strongest argument for McNamara's inclusion. Though obviously the gross point and assist totals and associated rankings play a role, too, as does his championship ring.
Sidat-Singh is an extremely unique outlier based on his heroic World War 2 efforts.
Every possible box that needs to be checked as to whether a modern college basketball player is worthy of having their jersey retired, GMac meets the criteria. He meets the objective criteria (Top 5 in multiple major statistical categories), and he meets the subjective criteria (he is responsible for so, so many memorable moments that we're all going to tell our kids and grandkids about).