When evaluating Marrone's performance here's

[GoSU96]

something to chew on.

 

[Millhouse]

something to chew on.

2012 offense is going to be better but it's too soon to include 2012 on that graph. who knows maybe it goes up even more, let's hope

 

[SoBristol]

Helps to have a third year starter at QB, seniors and juniors at WR and TE, a little depth at RB, a young OC growing in his third season with the team, and an off-season focused on revamping the offense.

 

[Upstate]

2007. Sweet Jesus that's ugly.

 

[GoSU96]

2012 offense is going to be better but it's too soon to include 2012 on that graph. who knows maybe it goes up even more, let's hope

Some here said that it wouldn't happen until Nassib was gone.

I can't remember who that was.

 

[GoSU96]

2007. Sweet Jesus that's ugly.

That's what Marrone walked into.

 

[orange79]

That's what Marrone walked into.

Just stop. GRob left us in fine shape. I read that here.

 

[Millhouse]

Some here said that it wouldn't happen until Nassib was gone.

I can't remember who that was.

We'll see.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

 

[SaintTristan]

Nassib is great and right now he is the only thing standing between marrone and unemployment. But what happens next yr when nassib is gone? Marrone didn't recruit anyone who can play. Maybe yet maybe at all

 

[GoSU96]

Nassib is great and right now he is the only thing standing between marrone and unemployment. But what happens next yr when nassib is gone? Marrone didn't recruit anyone who can play. Maybe yet maybe at all

Just stop.

 

[rocklloyd]

FWIW, Our punt coverage is worst in nation.

 

[Millhouse]

Few things

Last year after 2 games, comparable schedule 150 rating. This year 139.

2010-2011 overall rating against teams on our big east schedule. Let's hope the Big East schedule goes better for him. He's been a different guy against conference opponents. Now granted, WVU is omitted because we don't play them (he has a 151 rating against them).
Rutgers 92.8127
Louisville 109.1588
Connecticut 109.4187
South Florida 118.6529
Pittsburgh 108.8513
Cincinnati 106.9563

 

[GoSU96]

FWIW, Our punt coverage is worst in nation.

Did I refer to punting. The obsession here has been the offense.

 

[GoSU96]

Few things

Last year after 2 games, comparable schedule 150 rating. This year 139.

2010-2011 overall rating against teams on our big east schedule. Let's hope the Big East schedule goes better for him. He's been a different guy against conference opponents. Now granted, WVU is omitted because we don't play them (he has a 151 rating against them).
Rutgers 92.8127
Louisville 109.1588
Connecticut 109.4187
South Florida 118.6529
Pittsburgh 108.8513
Cincinnati 106.9563

One item out of many.

 

[rocklloyd]

Did I refer to punting. The obsession here has been the offense.

don't know what you referring did not see a statement from you

 

[Millhouse]

One item out of many.

not sure what that means. my beef with nassib has been conference games. maybe that was just coincidence that he's been good out of conference and bad in conference. we'll know soon enough. if he has a good year in conference, have at it.

overall career stats by opponent. we'll see how this formats (cfbstats + excel is the greatest). hard not to notice the big east teams making up most of the bottom half. there's not a big east team on the schedule where he has a career rating above 120.


Kansas State 13 for 22, 239 yards, 3 tds, 0 ints, 195.35 rating
Toledo 16 for 25, 213 yards, 2 tds, 0 ints, 161.97 rating
Wake Forest 20 for 28, 178 yards, 3 tds, 0 ints, 160.19 rating
West Virginia 37 for 64, 432 yards, 7 tds, 0 ints, 150.61 rating
Akron 17 for 28, 229 yards, 2 tds, 1 ints, 145.84 rating
Northwestern 44 for 65, 470 yards, 4 tds, 1 ints, 145.66 rating
USC 56 for 84, 580 yards, 4 tds, 2 ints, 135.62 rating
Penn State 4 for 5, 30 yards, 0 tds, 0 ints, 130.4 rating
Tulane 19 for 34, 186 yards, 2 tds, 0 ints, 121.25 rating
South Florida 35 for 68, 426 yards, 3 tds, 0 ints, 118.65 rating
Connecticut 51 for 84, 510 yards, 3 tds, 3 ints, 116.36 rating
Cincinnati 42 for 74, 425 yards, 3 tds, 2 ints, 112.97 rating
Louisville 43 for 73, 338 yards, 2 tds, 0 ints, 106.84 rating
Washington 19 for 37, 224 yards, 1 tds, 1 ints, 105.72 rating
Boston College 15 for 24, 147 yards, 0 tds, 1 ints, 105.62 rating
Rutgers 35 for 69, 452 yards, 1 tds, 4 ints, 98.94 rating
Pittsburgh 53 for 94, 477 yards, 2 tds, 5 ints, 95.39 rating

 

[Millhouse]

bump

 

[RICuse44]

The only rating I really care about is his win loss rating. He made more clutch plays as a sophomore than a senior to date.