William Kyle appears to be on the shorter side | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com
.

William Kyle appears to be on the shorter side

Jeremy McNeil was a block machine, especially in the comeback game during the 2003 run, and Otis Hill was fine down low. They were both 6'8". I'm less concerned with height and more with athleticism and physicality. Those guys were both 250 lbs and McNeil had springs for legs. If he can have some resemblance to them, we'll be happy.
 
The late great Al Mcguire once said Otis Hill is 6'8 but he has wide shoulders which makes him 7 feet. Note he did not say that his height plays up to 7 feet or he is LIKE a 7 footer. He said his wide shoulders mean he IS 7 feet. Loved that guy. Also wipe out by TODD
 
Jeremy McNeil was a block machine, especially in the comeback game during the 2003 run, and Otis Hill was fine down low. They were both 6'8". I'm less concerned with height and more with athleticism and physicality. Those guys were both 250 lbs and McNeil had springs for legs. If he can have some resemblance to them, we'll be happy.
Not that it matters but Jeremy is about two inches taller than Otis. Hill might be 6’6 with shoes on. My point is listed heights can be modified by a few inches, if you can play you can play.
 
Jeremy McNeil was a block machine, especially in the comeback game during the 2003 run, and Otis Hill was fine down low. They were both 6'8". I'm less concerned with height and more with athleticism and physicality. Those guys were both 250 lbs and McNeil had springs for legs. If he can have some resemblance to them, we'll be happy.
McNeil was great to run the press with. He would pretty much block every shot if a team broke the press .
 
I feel like he was brought in to defend the post, so I sure hope he is a plus defender!

Even though it wasn't a major conference, it looks like he blocked a bunch of shots for the jackrabbits.

Game film showed that he isn't much of a defender, especially against multiple P4 caliber teams. Agree that his athleticism makes him a decent weakside shotblocker.

He is a terrific rebounder, which is good. But he isn't an elite defender by any means. Guys his size who were P4 opponents scored right over him.
 
Outside of Fab and Etan, McNeil was the best shot blocker we have ever had.

The stats may beg to differ with you.


IF you set the bar at 2.0 blocks / game or better, then (sadly) McNeil doesn't even make the cut.
There are 8 Cuse players who averaged 2+ blocks/gm for their careers.


On a per-game basis, it's Etan by a mile at 3.5 - and then Rosie Bouie next at 2.8.
Rony and DC also stand out.

Surprise entries in the 2+ Club: Chewie, and CMac.


Fab was great at positional D and drawing charges. He was elite at that.
And yes - he was an effective shotblocker, but not as prolific in that regard as others.
 
The stats may beg to differ with you.


IF you set the bar at 2.0 blocks / game or better, then (sadly) McNeil doesn't even make the cut.
There are 8 Cuse players who averaged 2+ blocks/gm for their careers.


On a per-game basis, it's Etan by a mile at 3.5 - and then Rosie Bouie next at 2.8.
Rony and DC also stand out.

Surprise entries in the 2+ Club: Chewie, and CMac.


Fab was great at positional D and drawing charges. He was elite at that.
And yes - he was an effective shotblocker, but not as prolific in that regard as others.
I feel like this is a place where per 40s would be a better comparison point than per game averages.
 
I feel like this is a place where per 40s would be a better comparison point than per game averages.

You can feel free to compile those stats.

But yes - a guy like McNeil (or Fab for that matter), who "only" played about half a game on average, would have much better per-40 #'s than per-game #'s.
 
Game film showed that he isn't much of a defender, especially against multiple P4 caliber teams. Agree that his athleticism makes him a decent weakside shotblocker.

He is a terrific rebounder, which is good. But he isn't an elite defender by any means. Guys his size who were P4 opponents scored right over him.

From the looks of the schedule we will see more guys that are a threat via forcing a switch off a ball screen than guys who can do damage posting up around the rim. So it’s going to be on Red to hopefully make the right call as to whether he’s running Kyle or Souare etc at the pivot. A big part of that too is how well Donnie and Nate defend alongside etc.

He shouldn’t run into the issues of being unable to switch and recover like Lampkin and he should have help defending the rim given the personnel we have this year. Should is going to be my operative reference at this point…
 
lol what the hell do you mean a real 6’9. They’re both quite literally factually and scientifically 6’9. William Kyle is strong and athletic as hell and is by no means slender
Factually and Scientifically?! They weren't scientific study specimens...
You obviously don't understand the concept in many cases the difference between athletic program published heights and reality.
 
Factually and Scientifically?! They weren't scientific study specimens...
You obviously don't understand the concept in many cases the difference between athletic program published heights and reality.
IMG_3437.gif
 
Game film showed that he isn't much of a defender, especially against multiple P4 caliber teams. Agree that his athleticism makes him a decent weakside shotblocker.

He is a terrific rebounder, which is good. But he isn't an elite defender by any means. Guys his size who were P4 opponents scored right over him.
but but but everyone on here says height doesnt matter and he plays taller

lol

im gonna reserve final judgement until the real games start...but personally I wouldnt trust a small center ...it could work, but im skeptical
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,772
Messages
5,184,040
Members
6,153
Latest member
MK-squad

Online statistics

Members online
334
Guests online
2,116
Total visitors
2,450


...
Top Bottom