We needed a three, and you don't think our lack of three point shooters is a relevant fact. Someone shoot me.skurey said:I don't think us having only one good 3 point shooter is relevant. We needed a 3. It would be nice if it could have gone to Cooney but really anyone taking a 3 is better than what happened.
Watch the replay. Trevor had two options. Silent g sprinted to the far corner and would have had a clean look at a three...but...that would have been very difficult pass to make along the baseline.
Option two was the quick pass back inbounds that has probably been our most effective play to get an open three this year.
The easier pass was to Rak for the quick pass back for three. Trevor made a judgment on the inbounds and it didn't work.
It's not like we have a plethora of shooters to dazzle teams with in that circumstance. Defenses need to guard two players...and they'd take their chances letting anyone but Cooney get that shot.
It's not like you can wave a magic wand and get a wide open three with only one deep threat. Was it a great result, no, and there probably were other options. But I'm not going to beat up the staff for that call when it's worked so well this year.
As far as criticizing JBs x and o's. Eh. The numbers in close games pretty much ruin that line of thinking. And he's run the high cross screens for our point guards to get easy hard dive layups out of bounds for years. Flynn, mcw and ennis ruined teams with that all the time.
Selective criticism when something doesn't work.
The fact that we didn't get run out if the building yesterday despite getting down 10 twice was more impressive coaching to me.
We needed a three, and you don't think our lack of three point shooters is a relevant fact.
Someone shoot me.
No. Inside out, without the foul, collapses the D and could have given Cooney more room, as people naturally follow the ball.You missed his point. His point was that we needed a catch and shoot 3, not a pass inside the 3 pt line to a guy facing away from the basket. Chino fadeaway would have been a better option. It at least would have given us a 1% chance.
No. Inside out, without the foul, collapses the D and coild have given Cooney more room, as people naturally follow the ball.
didn't cooney airball a trey to tie with 8 seconds left ?
CusefanATL said:We needed a 3. Our best 3 pt shooter was out of the play. JB thought there was a chance that Rak could get the ball and pass back to Cooney without Rak being fouled. Whether or not that was option 1 is irrelevant. Our best shooter had no chance of taking the 3. Wasn't even a decoy. If that is selective criticism, you are blindly defending. It was an awful play call.
CusefanATL said:You missed his point. His point was that we needed a catch and shoot 3, not a pass inside the 3 pt line to a guy facing away from the basket. Chino fadeaway would have been a better option. It at least would have given us a 1% chance.
That's a pretty tough pass thoughJake said:Please look at this photo. Notice the wide open Silent G in the near corner. If Cooney makes that pass instead and we get a wide open look from him, JB is a genius for using Cooney as a decoy and getting our second best three point shooter an open look. He gave Cooney two options, Cooney choose one. It didn't work. That's why I said watch the replay.
Except option 1 is an impossible pass at that angle with the backboard and a man in the way and option 2 gives you zero chance to win.View attachment 34697
Please look at this photo. Notice the wide open Silent G in the near corner. If Cooney makes that pass instead and we get a wide open look from him, JB is a genius for using Cooney as a decoy and getting our second best three point shooter an open look.
He gave Cooney two options, Cooney choose one. It didn't work.
That's why I said watch the replay.
I assume a catch and shoot wide open 3 from Gbinje would be acceptable to the pitchfork brigade?
If Trevor make a different pass, that's what we get. But JB can't coach.
CusefanATL said:I didn't say he can't coach. I said that play was idiotic. And the dumbest I've ever seen of him. And there is nothing to change my opinion. Whether the pass to Rak was option 1 or option 2. It had to be 1 of the 2 options, correct? That means that JB thought that passing to Rak inside the 3 point line was an option. Which it wasn't. It guaranteed the loss as soon as it happened. And option 1 is passing under the basket to the opposite side of the court. Thats a really hard pass. And Cooney wasn't a decoy. He was inbounding the ball. He would have been better served sitting where G was as the decoy. They prob would have had 2 defenders on him allowing G and Buss a better shot of being open.
Those Milwaukee plays were not as low as the baseline. And I thought your original post called it a "very difficult pass"? I don't know how Cooney would have gotten beyond the guy parked in the lane.Jake said:YouTube Video Less than a minute in. Milwaukee's box 42 leak. That pass is used a lot in basketball. Its not that difficult. Especially with the bounce. High major d1 players should be expected to make that pass. You guys act like its a Hail Mary.
Less than a minute in. Milwaukee's box 42 leak.
That pass is used a lot in basketball. Its not that difficult. Especially with the bounce. High major d1 players should be expected to make that pass.
You guys act like its a Hail Mary.
that reminds me. did i not also hear a 5 SECOND call on miami last night? when's the last time that happened ?
And while we're at it...why continually permit teams to save clock at crunch time by rolling the ball to mid-court (see Nova game)? A little token pressure before falling back to the zone wouldn't hurt.I might get flamed for typing this, but JB has never been a great X's and O's coach and he's gotten even worse in recent years. How often does he design a great play in crunch time on his wipe board that actually stands out as a winning play?
And it's inexcuseable that we have two out of bounds plays.
With a team this offensively challenged, why not run some set alley oops? We need as many easy points as we can get. And we run way too much ISO offense, especially considering we lack ISO players.
CusefanATL said:You do realize that NBA can't camp out in the lane right? Ive never seen you so passionate about anything. And it's surprising that you choose this. If his 2nd option was to give the ball to Rak inside the 3 pt line with his back to the basket, yes - I think it goes without saying it was a terrible play call. In the TO, JB should have said NOT to do that.