Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RF2044, post: 5417729, member: 40"] Sure. But that's not the way the student judicial board [or whatever the hell they are called] saw it. Somebody [who wasn't even an enrolled student] made an accusation that didn't include their culpability in what happened, and the University decided that based upon the "violent offense" nature of the allegation alone, Allen needed to be dismissed, with little regard to the fact pattern of the situation. He got railroaded. As you seem to be advocating [and we're just having a discussion, IO, not critiquing your opinion], what the person is accused or [or alleged to have done] should be the determinant of whether they deserve a second chance. I'm just advocating peeling back the onion a little more before making that determination. [/QUOTE]