Island. Winner of that would probably play Michigan, then it would be ND. Tough match-ups IMHO.
Bracketology with Joe Lunardi
Bracketology with Joe Lunardi
I have to admit I have little confidence in SU making the field of 68, even though almost all of the games played by the other contenders for the last few spots fell in our favor on Friday and Saturday. Lunardi has us in. Palm doesn't have us close. He has Georgia, with a 1-9 record against top 50 teams ahead of us (we are 6-8). I assume Palm looks at our record against teams ranked 101-200 (4-4) and that weighs heavily into his decision-making. SU had so many opportunities to get the 1 or 2 additional wins (1st Louisville game, Miami game) and failed. You can also look at several of our victories (Clemson, NC State, Duke, Wake Forest) where we pulled victory out of a hat, but a win is a win. Keeping my fingers crossed.
Palm bases his bracket mostly on history and what the committee has done in the past, which fine. However, the field recently expanded to 68 and there has been a lot of talk about how the RPI is rarely used anymore. So Palm is basing everything what has happened on the past. He is hedging his bet in a way since if we do get in, he will pull out those "no team has ever gotten in with 2 road wins, etc".Palm has talked about RPI and 2-11 record as would be being worst to have made tourney and the 5 bad losses being tied with worst to have made tourney outweighing the 6 top 50 wins and that inevitably 1 or 2 teams with that many wins always gets left out (not sure i believe that last point without evidence)
I'm curious if any of the other bubble team profiles are unprecedented.Palm has talked about RPI and 2-11 record as would be being worst to have made tourney and the 5 bad losses being tied with worst to have made tourney outweighing the 6 top 50 wins and that inevitably 1 or 2 teams with that many wins always gets left out (not sure i believe that last point without evidence)
Lunardi remains a total doofus so take that into account. Doesn't mean he's wrong about us getting in, just that if he is right it is more lucky than good.
Those pigs will eat anything.Not even so much luck - it's only a small handful of teams that are actually up for debate each year.
More like educated guessing. He has to pick maybe 4-5 out of 7-9 potential options.
In his case - even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while.
Vandy will break the all time loss record. I believe.I'm curious if any of the other bubble team profiles are unprecedented.
Being anti-SU is the most coverage and clicks that Davis and Palm get all year. SU is good for business.The whole anti Syracuse machine will be revving back up to top speed if we get in. Just standard ops at this point.
Remaining consistent.
I wonder if either of them will do a hidden first pump under table if we get in.That will be funny if we make it in over USC. USC will be watching the selection show and all heads will turn and give death stares to Jason Hart and Tony Bland.
Does this mean Vegas likes our chances or doesn't?
It's strange I don't know. I'd think it would be because you'd have to put up 210 dollars to win 100 just to bet no. The positive ml makes no sense though so I have no idea .Does this mean Vegas likes our chances or doesn't?