Yukon/Tennessee level of respect | Syracusefan.com
.

Yukon/Tennessee level of respect

DomeHolmes

2nd String
Joined
Sep 3, 2024
Messages
605
Like
1,833
We are playing a historically good, ranked SEC program on the road, then playing #83 Yukon at home. We are getting more respect from Tennessee than I expected, (after reading their board) and we are not getting the respect we deserve from Yukon.

Most of the thoughts on the Tennessee board are things like “Tennessee should win, but could lose”, “They’ve lost to worse”, “Fran Brown is a good coach, not to be underestimated”, “Syracuse might be the fifth best team they play this year”. But the general consensus is that they don’t think we can stop their run, their D is too good, and they are too talented across the board. They believe if they bring their “A” game, we cannot beat them. Surprisingly, almost nobody said that we are trash and they will steam roll us.

On the UConn board on the other hand, there are not too many posts, but the general consensus is that they will win “two out of three versus the ACC”, and likely run the table versus the rest of their incredibly weak schedule. One poster called our game a coin flip. Tennessee for the most part lives in the real world, and Yukon is as delusional as Rutgers.

But reading the Tennessee board gave me a few more reasons for optimism. (Of course our concerns are big, and just as they say, can we stop their run? Is their defense too deep and talented?). But lots of reasons for optimism.

1. Tennessee loses starting QB, all SEC RB, two starting receivers, and four linemen from an offense that was mostly one dimensional last year, and this is the first game of the year, and the QB may be turnover prone. Very similar to us, and like us they have confidence in their replacements, but lots of unknowns.

2. I saw lots of things on tape in their game versus Ohio State that are things that Nixon likes to run.

3. Fran Brown coached defense against Tennessee in the SEC and they think that will help us.

4. Tennessee is not as highly regarded (#24) in the polls compared to last year, so the concensus is their talent level may be down. If we were playing #25 Boise State or #23 Texas Tech, would we be as worried?

5. How talented is their defense really? I just looked at the “all SEC defense”. Despite all the talk about how good their defensive line is, they do not have any players on the first, second or third team! (Which, of course, does not mean that they are not still really good, but there is no one terrifying). We faced several Clemson teams where they had several first second and third team ALL AMERICANS on their defensive line and often times fared better than you would expect. Their first team SEC corner is going to miss our game. Finally they have a player who is a second team all SEC projection who is so volatile they have a 90 page thread about whether or not he will play, be benched for disciplinary reasons, or transfer without playing. And although this has nothing to do with how their team will prepare, their fan base almost all agreed that they would “push around Ohio State” in the trenches. We might not be quick enough or athletic enough in the trenches, but we will not be pushed around.
 
We are playing a historically good, ranked SEC program on the road, then playing #83 Yukon at home. We are getting more respect from Tennessee than I expected, (after reading their board) and we are not getting the respect we deserve from Yukon.

Most of the thoughts on the Tennessee board are things like “Tennessee should win, but could lose”, “They’ve lost to worse”, “Fran Brown is a good coach, not to be underestimated”, “Syracuse might be the fifth best team they play this year”. But the general consensus is that they don’t think we can stop their run, their D is too good, and they are too talented across the board. They believe if they bring their “A” game, we cannot beat them. Surprisingly, almost nobody said that we are trash and they will steam roll us.

On the UConn board on the other hand, there are not too many posts, but the general consensus is that they will win “two out of three versus the ACC”, and likely run the table versus the rest of their incredibly weak schedule. One poster called our game a coin flip. Tennessee for the most part lives in the real world, and Yukon is as delusional as Rutgers.

But reading the Tennessee board gave me a few more reasons for optimism. (Of course our concerns are big, and just as they say, can we stop their run? Is their defense too deep and talented?). But lots of reasons for optimism.

1. Tennessee loses starting QB, all SEC RB, two starting receivers, and four linemen from an offense that was mostly one dimensional last year, and this is the first game of the year, and the QB may be turnover prone. Very similar to us, and like us they have confidence in their replacements, but lots of unknowns.

2. I saw lots of things on tape in their game versus Ohio State that are things that Nixon likes to run.

3. Fran Brown coached defense against Tennessee in the SEC and they think that will help us.

4. Tennessee is not as highly regarded (#24) in the polls compared to last year, so the concensus is their talent level may be down. If we were playing #25 Boise State or #23 Texas Tech, would we be as worried?

5. How talented is their defense really? I just looked at the “all SEC defense”. Despite all the talk about how good their defensive line is, they do not have any players on the first, second or third team! (Which, of course, does not mean that they are not still really good, but there is no one terrifying). We faced several Clemson teams where they had several first second and third team ALL AMERICANS on their defensive line and often times fared better than you would expect. Their first team SEC corner is going to miss our game. Finally they have a player who is a second team all SEC projection who is so volatile they have a 90 page thread about whether or not he will play, be benched for disciplinary reasons, or transfer without playing. And although this has nothing to do with how their team will prepare, their fan base almost all agreed that they would “push around Ohio State” in the trenches. We might not be quick enough or athletic enough in the trenches, but we will not be pushed around.
UConn fan posted on Reddit whether they will get into the playoffs at 12-0.

For whatever its worth, I think unlikely. If they beat us, Duke, and BC... that means us, Duke, and BC are not that good. So why would that be enough of a bump to get an at-large? Remember, UConn cannot even get the G5 spot. That is reserved for a conference champion. So they will be competing with 9-3 SEC and B1G teams... good luck...
 
Tenn game is very hard to get a read on with both teams replacing so much. Tenn seems like they will have a very solid defense and likely a good run game. Not sure how good their passing game will be but obviously with SU replacing both starting corners there could be some growing pain there. I think most would accept a close hard fought loss as a good sign overall.

Uconn game I think may end up being much closer than many expect. Uconn returns a decent amount of skill position guys including their QB who somehow got an extra year of eligibility and their #1 WR. They did lose a lot defensively essentially the entire front 7 and a number of O-linemen as well. Still SU will becoming off the Tenn game while they play a D1-AA squad the week before. I know Colgate is the following week for SU but this feels like a trap game, with the noon start, major opponent difference the week before etc. I hope Fran and the team are ready.
 
Tenn game could very easily make Uconn game much harder.

1) we beat Tenn and getting them to focus
2) we lose and struggle to focus.

Maybe we are a turnover machine with the new QBs?

who knows.
 
We only beat UConn by 7 last year, and that included a shoe string tackle by Justin Barron when their running back had a breakaway run to the endzone. I expect to win that game, but we have to play very solid on both sides of the ball.
Last years game was not easy. Their front seven gave us problems.
 
I hate this line of thinking. You play whoever is on the schedule.
While I normally agree with this, our schedule is largely made by the ACC. And we play ND and Tennessee.

UConn makes their own schedule 100%.

They decided to schedule eight teams ranked 100 or worse.

If by some miracle they went 12-0, they would not have a playoff resume.
 
We are playing a historically good, ranked SEC program on the road, then playing #83 Yukon at home. We are getting more respect from Tennessee than I expected, (after reading their board) and we are not getting the respect we deserve from Yukon.

Most of the thoughts on the Tennessee board are things like “Tennessee should win, but could lose”, “They’ve lost to worse”, “Fran Brown is a good coach, not to be underestimated”, “Syracuse might be the fifth best team they play this year”. But the general consensus is that they don’t think we can stop their run, their D is too good, and they are too talented across the board. They believe if they bring their “A” game, we cannot beat them. Surprisingly, almost nobody said that we are trash and they will steam roll us.

On the UConn board on the other hand, there are not too many posts, but the general consensus is that they will win “two out of three versus the ACC”, and likely run the table versus the rest of their incredibly weak schedule. One poster called our game a coin flip. Tennessee for the most part lives in the real world, and Yukon is as delusional as Rutgers.

But reading the Tennessee board gave me a few more reasons for optimism. (Of course our concerns are big, and just as they say, can we stop their run? Is their defense too deep and talented?). But lots of reasons for optimism.

1. Tennessee loses starting QB, all SEC RB, two starting receivers, and four linemen from an offense that was mostly one dimensional last year, and this is the first game of the year, and the QB may be turnover prone. Very similar to us, and like us they have confidence in their replacements, but lots of unknowns.

2. I saw lots of things on tape in their game versus Ohio State that are things that Nixon likes to run.

3. Fran Brown coached defense against Tennessee in the SEC and they think that will help us.

4. Tennessee is not as highly regarded (#24) in the polls compared to last year, so the concensus is their talent level may be down. If we were playing #25 Boise State or #23 Texas Tech, would we be as worried?

5. How talented is their defense really? I just looked at the “all SEC defense”. Despite all the talk about how good their defensive line is, they do not have any players on the first, second or third team! (Which, of course, does not mean that they are not still really good, but there is no one terrifying). We faced several Clemson teams where they had several first second and third team ALL AMERICANS on their defensive line and often times fared better than you would expect. Their first team SEC corner is going to miss our game. Finally they have a player who is a second team all SEC projection who is so volatile they have a 90 page thread about whether or not he will play, be benched for disciplinary reasons, or transfer without playing. And although this has nothing to do with how their team will prepare, their fan base almost all agreed that they would “push around Ohio State” in the trenches. We might not be quick enough or athletic enough in the trenches, but we will not be pushed around.
UConn fans will never give us respect because they hate us. That's the great thing about rivalries.
 
I do think UCONN will be better this year
Last year the game was an odd one for us. We had 7 penalties, missed a 4th and 5 by a yard, and Kyle looked sloppy in some key moments including a bad sack towards the end of the game.
Defense was also asleep on UCONNS first TD.
Let's home Fran reminds them of what can happen if you don't bring your A game each week.
 
Image.jpeg

At the "S" they gain respect the old fashioned way, they EARN IT!
 
I hope the line gets worse. I'll be in Vegas this weekend and can actually bet on SU football.
As the board's Vegas expert, what are your thoughts on all these stories I'm seeing about hotel occupancy levels and foot traffic being at all-time lows?
 
As the board's Vegas expert, what are your thoughts on all these stories I'm seeing about hotel occupancy levels and foot traffic being at all-time lows?
As a frequent Vegas traveler, I will share what I know. Year over year, strip revenue (gaming, rooms, food) is down about 6%. Part of the problem has been overbuilding. The fountainbleau and Resorts World added 8000 hotel rooms. Adding about 5% more rooms to a city that was not at full capacity to begin with. Now with more competition, rooms are cheaper. The Raiders have not offset that as hoped, but it would be worse without them.

Vegas’s real challenges are very similar to what happened to Atlantic City, but for a little different reason. Atlantic City was destroyed by the opening of casinos in Philadelphia and Connecticut. Safer areas with less travel and far lower cost. Vegas, (and other casinos) are being hurt most now by online gaming. If just 6% of customers decide to stay home to gamble, there is the loss right there.

Treasure Island , Mirage/Hardrock, Flamingo, Park MGM, Luxor, Excalibur and a few others closed their poker rooms over the last five years due to decreased demand. Planet Hollywood and Resorts opened rooms but they are dead. Online poker has been devastating to them.

However, all is not lost for the casinos. Sands, MGM, Ceasars, and Wynn all are actually seeing INCREASED revenue, because they have diversified operations, and are involved in online gaming, offsetting losses in the physical casinos. So the casino companies are actually doing fine, even if the casinos themselves are hurting a little bit.

I was just there in June. It’s never been easier to get a table at Spago or other in demand restaurants, partly due to the already outrageous prices, escalating faster than inflation. And even with the decreased crowds, it’s still too crowded. I go Sunday to Friday and avoid the weekend.
 
Tenn game is very hard to get a read on with both teams replacing so much. Tenn seems like they will have a very solid defense and likely a good run game. Not sure how good their passing game will be but obviously with SU replacing both starting corners there could be some growing pain there. I think most would accept a close hard fought loss as a good sign overall.

Uconn game I think may end up being much closer than many expect. Uconn returns a decent amount of skill position guys including their QB who somehow got an extra year of eligibility and their #1 WR. They did lose a lot defensively essentially the entire front 7 and a number of O-linemen as well. Still SU will becoming off the Tenn game while they play a D1-AA squad the week before. I know Colgate is the following week for SU but this feels like a trap game, with the noon start, major opponent difference the week before etc. I hope Fran and the team are ready.
Exactly the way I am looking at it and quite honestly I don't think anybody knows what Syracuse will look like this year. A blow out loss and poor performance against Tenn and then the UCONN game which is a very BIG game for them could be a real test early. Mora is a pretty good coach and will have them ready. It's a must win for Syracuse given the schedule but I agree it's not going to be an easy one. They aren't a bad team by any means. A game we should win for sure but not expecting an easy one
 

Forum statistics

Threads
173,900
Messages
5,119,973
Members
6,073
Latest member
CheerMom12

Online statistics

Members online
202
Guests online
1,635
Total visitors
1,837


...
Top Bottom