UpstateSM
First to Surmise Dakota Leffew Would Be Orange
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2019
- Messages
- 9,669
- Like
- 39,757
Rutgers, if you consider them “P5”Is there a closer P5 school he could have even gone to?
Rutgers, if you consider them “P5”Is there a closer P5 school he could have even gone to?
BC *Gulp*Is there a closer P5 school he could have even gone to?
You wikipedia all the stats you want. I watched the games. The fact that the coaches went out and grabbed a transfer is all the proof anyone needs and pitched him to slide right into Eli's spot. A trio of Q, Marek and Bras is bottom of the ACC.
You wikipedia all the stats you want. I watched the games. The fact that the coaches went out and grabbed a transfer is all the proof anyone needs and pitched him to slide right into Eli's spot. A trio of Q, Marek and Bras is bottom of the ACC.
If you consider Rutgers a P5 school, yes. No one considers them one, but technically, they might be.Is there a closer P5 school he could have even gone to?
You wikipedia all the stats you want. I watched the games. The fact that the coaches went out and grabbed a transfer is all the proof anyone needs and pitched him to slide right into Eli's spot. A trio of Q, Marek and Bras is bottom of the ACC.
I'm either too young or too old for Marty Blake...Marty Blake, is that you? I thought you died years ago.
A) you're wrong and B) I'm sure your "guy" loves you spouting this nonsense on hereYou wikipedia all the stats you want. I watched the games. The fact that the coaches went out and grabbed a transfer is all the proof anyone needs and pitched him to slide right into Eli's spot. A trio of Q, Marek and Bras is bottom of the ACC.
I don’t know Marty Blake, and I can’t speak for him. But, don’t sell yourself short, if you like Marty Blake, you go for it. Don’t let age get in the way.I'm either too young or too old for Marty Blake...
LOL alright man. I'll fade back to non posting.A) you're wrong and B) I'm sure your "guy" loves you spouting this nonsense on here
Love the info you bring. In this thread, however, you're only editorializing (i.e., your opinion) on the quality of our players - which is why I asked you to clarify, in the first place, whether the sentiment was yours or the staff'sLOL alright man. I'll fade back to non posting.
And people around here wonder why folks with connections to the coaches stop posting here.
LOL alright man. I'll fade back to non posting.
And people around here wonder why folks with connections to the coaches stop posting here.
<Snip>
OR they are going to run some of that Marek at the 5 lineups (ugh!)
imho, you are seriously under rating the returning forwards. after a slow start, quincy exhibited strong play in conference play - he was top 10 in the acc in both offensive rebounding percentage and block percentage. on the offensive end he hit over 57% from the field (in conference games), good for 11th in the conference.
and marek was one of the best all around forwards in the conference, top 20 in multiple categories, albeit in a non-featured role. and i expect him to have a much more up front role if there is a 20-21 season:
View attachment 181865
i am very glad the team landed griffin and i hope he gets his waiver, but the chicken little act if he does not is way overblown
Is anyone other than Buddy allowed to play the 2? Griffin is a natural 2 who can also play the 3.Because he is going to play the 3 here. He isn't taking Buddy's spot at the two. He won't play the point. That leaves the 3.
Our best lineup most likely features Buddy at the 2 and Griffin at the 3. With the foul trouble that QG and Marek both got into last year, it might be hard to have them both on the court for an extended period together; not to mention our offense will suffer. Griffin may never play the 2 if Kadary is capableIs anyone other than Buddy allowed to play the 2? Griffin is a natural 2 who can also play the 3.
It seems to me that if Kadary Richmond isn't ready for regular rotation minutes at guard, Griffin would slide easily into a combination of guard and forward minutes, much like Marek is used at F/C.Is anyone other than Buddy allowed to play the 2? Griffin is a natural 2 who can also play the 3.
?? Sure. Everyone is allowed to play the 2. The question on the floor was where would Griffin play? And the answer is the 3. Because we already have a 2 and that is Buddy. Our 3 left to play in the NBA. That spot is open.Is anyone other than Buddy allowed to play the 2? Griffin is a natural 2 who can also play the 3.
Yeah let’s bench the best 3pt shooter in the ACC ... lol?? Sure. Everyone is allowed to play the 2. The question on the floor was where would Griffin play? And the answer is the 3. Because we already have a 2 and that is Buddy. Our 3 left to play in the NBA. That spot is open.
LOL alright man. I'll fade back to non posting.
And people around here wonder why folks with connections to the coaches stop posting here.
Please go to the pay site for the my source is better than yours type of content
imho, you are seriously under rating the returning forwards. after a slow start, quincy exhibited strong play in conference play - he was top 10 in the acc in both offensive rebounding percentage and block percentage. on the offensive end he hit over 57% from the field (in conference games), good for 11th in the conference.
and marek was one of the best all around forwards in the conference, top 20 in multiple categories, albeit in a non-featured role. and i expect him to have a much more up front role if there is a 20-21 season:
View attachment 181865
i am very glad the team landed griffin and i hope he gets his waiver, but the chicken little act if he does not is way overblown
My fear, to with that tandem as well.Marek/Quincy are both good players but how often were they on the court together as forwards? If they were both in together it was usually because Sidibe was out and we were playing small.
There’s not enough outside shooting/perimeter ability in the game, if they’re both in there along with Sidibe. IMO.