The whole "second team out" thing doesn't make sense to me. If they told us we aren't in, fine, but would they get that specific?I did as well but 3 other moderators have basically given his post cover.
I think the post is obviously wrong.
We could be out and I don’t believe his post.
If he wants to claim his information as legit go all-in or it’s just a joke.
Why the hell wouldn’t Lunardi use this spreadsheet and make himself look good?A friend of mine at espn in 2016 had seen a spreadsheet showing we were in the morning of selection Sunday. I msg'd bees all excited. Then later the whole thing leaked. Just not a good year for security, that one...
I think bees is messing with everyone.So no one believes bees? I am worried he is right
That’s an 11 seed with no play in game lol.
That’s an 11 seed with no play in game lol.
That’s an 11 seed with no play in game lol.
That’s an 11 seed with no play in game lol.
ND's loses to Ball State and Indiana with Colson sure are impressive.I think it's us or Notre Dame for the last spot from the ACC. Note Dames strong wins in non conf when healthy worries me a lot. If Nevada hadn't lost I think both of us could have made it in. At this point I really think we are out. Not because we don't have a strong resume but because the bubble is much more competitive this year with more teams vying for final spots.
I assume we're not in. That way, if we do get it, it's a very pleasant surprise.Before seeing that link I was totally in NIT mode and done with anxiety... Uggh
ND has more road/neutral wins than most bubble teams thoughND's loses to Ball State and Indiana with Colson sure are impressive.
Before seeing that link I was totally in NIT mode and done with anxiety... Uggh
I've been following this process for 20 plus years and have never seen it happen.I think the NCAA goes to great lengths to ensure secrecy of the teams selected. But it is not out of the realm of possibility that a leak could occur on a given team...these are humans and mistakes/egos/whatever could allow a leak to occur.
The SOS and NCSS both stand out very positive for SU. Committee has to take into consideration that 6 of 13 losses are to #1 and #2 seeds Kansas, UVa, Duke, UNC. That is an amazing stat.I still don't get how Syracuse can be punished by not scheduling cupcakes and having the 16th toughest ocss, and going 11-2 with one of those loses to a likely 1 seed in the tournament.
Imagine getting this worked up over a guy you don’t know posting something on a message board.
We didn't beat elite teams but we did very good vs. those "above average" teams - Miami, Louisville, Clemson, Buffalo.The SOS and NCSS both stand out very positive for SU. Committee has to take into consideration that 6 of 13 losses are to #1 and #2 seeds Kansas, UVa, Duke, UNC. That is an amazing stat.
Interesting post, and I agree with you. I agree that last year's team was probably better, but this year is more consistent and much defensively. But last year I thought when we played an important, I knew we'd play very well - that team needed that moviation. This year's team plays pretty much the same regardless of the opponent, which is what you want.It's true but that's not a tourney metric...
We're better than most of these crap teams on the bubble and that's all that matters.
Our resume is stronger than last year but we're not as good. I'd agree with that.
I'd absolutely love to see us play Oklahoma in a play-in game.Interesting post, and I agree with you. I agree that last year's team was probably better, but this year is more consistent and much defensively. But last year I thought when we played an important, I knew we'd play very well - that team needed that moviation. This year's team plays pretty much the same regardless of the opponent, which is what you want.
But could we beat Oklahoma or Marquette or Oklahoma State? I'm not sure