what are the possible future repercussions of SU declaring him eligible?SU declared him ineligible before and then eligible. This time, the NCAA has declared him ineligible based on their review of what transpired.
SU declared him ineligible before and then eligible. This time, the NCAA has declared him ineligible based on their review of what transpired.
SU declared him ineligible before and then eligible. This time, the NCAA has declared him ineligible based on their review of what transpired.
From ESPN. NCAA didn't change their decision.
"Melo was declared ineligible by Syracuse, not the NCAA, according to Bob Williams, the NCAA vice president of communications. Citing a source, ESPN.com had reported earlier that the NCAA had revisited Melo's previous suspension. Williams said that the NCAA only deals in an athlete's initial eligibility; once a player is on campus, his eligibility is the responsibility of the school."
Where are you getting the NCAA issue from? According to espn, the NCAA is quoted as saying they have nothing to due with his eligibilitySU declared him ineligible before and then eligible. This time, the NCAA has declared him ineligible based on their review of what transpired.
Where are you getting the NCAA issue from? According to espn, the NCAA is quoted as saying they have nothing to due with his eligibility
I thought the NCAA guy just said they only review academic eligibility when a kid first enrolls. Did he not just say that?SU declared him ineligible before and then eligible. This time, the NCAA has declared him ineligible based on their review of what transpired.
The decision making on the hill regarding the basketball program and allowing Kevin drew to play this year leaves a lot to be desired.
Meaning in fact they do rule on his academic eligibilityIt didn't say that. They don't rule kids ineligible. Bt I am sure when a kid is ineligible by the school and then eligible, they have every right to review the decision to rule him eligible. If not, kids could never go to school and always be eligible. Or maybe this isn't the NCAA at all and SU has agin ruled him ineligible.
It didn't say that. They don't rule kids ineligible. Bt I am sure when a kid is ineligible by the school and then eligible, they have every right to review the decision to rule him eligible. If not, kids could never go to school and always be eligible. Or maybe this isn't the NCAA at all and SU has agin ruled him ineligible.
I thought the NCAA guy just said they only review academic eligibility when a kid first enrolls. Did he not just say that?
The various media reports are all contradicting each other. Fairly soon the NCAA and Syracuse are going to need to clarify, because this really looks like a clusterf**k right now.
Yes - and none of this 5 year, years ago, year and a half ago nonsense. Are we a noted communications school? :bat:The various media reports are all contradicting each other. Fairly soon the NCAA and Syracuse are going to need to clarify, because this really looks like a clusterf**k right now.
SU couldnt wait a month before kicking him out of school? sheesh
It would have to be a review of his final grades. Mid-terms don't mean jack. Players that leave early for the NB often quit going to school after the tournament and end up failing. It doesn't matter because they were eligible at the time of the tournamentSo ... is this a review of his Fall Semester grades, or did Fab bumble on his mid-terms?
So, SU has an internal policy to determine academic eligability which SU follows, and the NCAA sanctions us and SU has an internal drug policy which it doesn't follow, and its yet to be determined if we get sanctioned.SU declared him ineligible before and then eligible. This time, the NCAA has declared him ineligible based on their review of what transpired.