Matchups vs teams like NW are hard and I understand that but 2 of the TD's were scored over our LB's in the end zone. Did anyone watching the game see how this happened and we got caught in these positions?
LB's covering wr's not good no matter what way you look at it, NOT GOOD
We had too many LBs out there. It made sense the first 50 mins of the game when NW was a pass first team. The Vaughan TD you need to just tip your cap to NW. However that last drive we invited mismatches. I hope that the Okie this year does not have 3 LBs out there as it severely limits our capabilities in that package. We would be a lot better off with Esk playing the SS/LB hybrid and Desir at FS vs having one of Davis or Lynch trying to cover WRs all day.
I know one was at least in part due to the helmet rule...Reddish had to come out for the mandatory 1 play which definately hurt, but then he stayed out for some reason...not sure if the TD occurred on the mandatory play or afterward...either way, Reddish is a nice step up in what is otherwise a scary secondary (in a bad way, not a good way)
We had too many LBs out there. It made sense the first 50 mins of the game when NW was a pass first team. The Vaughan TD you need to just tip your cap to NW. However that last drive we invited mismatches. I hope that the Okie this year does not have 3 LBs out there as it severely limits our capabilities in that package. We would be a lot better off with Esk playing the SS/LB hybrid and Desir at FS vs having one of Davis or Lynch trying to cover WRs all day.
I know one was at least in part due to the helmet rule...Reddish had to come out for the mandatory 1 play which definately hurt, but then he stayed out for some reason...not sure if the TD occurred on the mandatory play or afterward...either way, Reddish is a nice step up in what is otherwise a scary secondary (in a bad way, not a good way)
Should have been in a dime. Were we even in a nickel?
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2