OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 224,205
- Like
- 400,021
Boone’s going to be collecting unemployment soon.Boone wants his money's worth.
Because you can't fire the team. The Yankee payroll would cover the National Debt.Boone’s going to be collecting unemployment soon.
No reason to rest Judge tonight with the off day coming up Batting Donaldson third and Gallo 4th is ridiculous. Donaldson has the slowest bat on the team right now. Get him in the cage and out of the dh position if you want to get him batting practice. If you want to rest Judge tonight let him dh.Because you can't fire the team. The Yankee payroll would cover the National Debt.
Donaldson, Kiner-Falefa, LeMahieu, and Rizzo all have relatively high career contact rates. Unfortunately, it has not worked out well so far this season.To many all or nothing hitters still in this lineup.
That standard shows no understanding or appreciation for the randomness of the MLB postseason. You can have a perfectly built team, and there is still only a slightly better chance than a coin flip that they will win a best of five series. The probabilities are only a little bit better of winning a seven game series.Cashman put together a non-ws team for 12 years. He has to go.
I doubt it. The Yankees could have let him walk after his last contract was up, but chose to bring him back. That was the time to part ways, not a few weeks into the season.Boone’s going to be collecting unemployment soon.
Yeah it was a joke in reply to the OX post about Boone getting his money’s worth.I doubt it. The Yankees could have let him walk after his last contract was up, but chose to bring him back. That was the time to part ways, not a few weeks into the season.
12 years and not even an appearance in the WS is much more than just random or bad luck. 3-5 years, then sure. That's likely too small.That standard shows no understanding or appreciation for the randomness of the MLB postseason. You can have a perfectly built team, and there is still only a slightly better chance than a coin flip that they will win a best of five series. The probabilities are only a little bit better of winning a seven game series.
I am not arguing that Cashman is a good or bad GM, but nobody's employment should be based on the results of a random process.
I will NOT be doing anymore math, good sir.12 years and not even an appearance in the WS is much more than just random or bad luck. 3-5 years, then sure. That's likely too small.
There are 30 MLB teams. Two teams appear in the WS each year. It's been 12 years. Do the math.
I think you need help with concepts like “randomness” and “probabilities.” Check your math.12 years and not even an appearance in the WS is much more than just random or bad luck. 3-5 years, then sure. That's likely too small.
There are 30 MLB teams. Two teams appear in the WS each year. It's been 12 years. Do the math.
One thing about math. You don’t need to be Einstein to realize you can’t hide from it. This isn’t a condemnation of Hicks but his lifetime batting average with bases loaded is .140 That means he had a 14% chance of getting a hit in that situation last night. It wasn’t his fault that he didn’t. It was math searching him out and finding him.I think you need help with concepts like “randomness” and “probabilities.” Check your math.
How many bases loaded at bats has he had?One thing about math. You don’t need to be Einstein to realize you can’t hide from it. This isn’t a condemnation of Hicks but his lifetime batting average with bases loaded is .140 That means he had a 14% chance of getting a hit in that situation last night. It wasn’t his fault that he didn’t. It was math searching him out and finding him.
How many bases loaded at bats has he had?
One thing about math. You don’t need to be Einstein to realize you can’t hide from it. This isn’t a condemnation of Hicks but his lifetime batting average with bases loaded is .140 That means he had a 14% chance of getting a hit in that situation last night. It wasn’t his fault that he didn’t. It was math searching him out and finding him.
It's certainly not good, but one also should not overreact to small sample sizes. We learn in high school statistics class that you want a minimum sample of 100 before judging anything. With batting average you want even more. Look at how much variability there is in batting average for a consistent guy like Tony Gwynn in his career. He was getting 500+ plate appearances each year. His batting average would vary nearly 50 points.Quite a few it was 50+ I believe. His average was actually worse, it was .132 prior to the double play so he's under .130 now
Eh... you get a pretty good idea of where things are headed in the 30-35 range.It's certainly not good, but one also should not overreact to small sample sizes. We learn in high school statistics class that you want a minimum sample of 100 before judging anything.
Not with batting average.Eh... you get a pretty good idea of where things are headed in the 30-35 range.
Eh. I was trying to make a math joke. But my jokes have been about as flat as the Yankee lineup. Anyway here’s a stat. In 484 career at bats with RISP Gallo is batting .198. So let’s bat him cleanup where he would be expected to come up with a RISP. Judge should have been in the lineup last night as DH. Stanton should have been batting cleanup.Not with batting average.
This weekend, your qualifiers should be in the 30-40 plate appearance range. Compare the batting average leader board on Sunday to the leader board on May 1, June 1, July 1 and so on. There is a ton of variability.
That’s fair, although I wouldn’t look at batting average to determine whom should be hitting where.Eh. I was trying to make a math joke. But my jokes have been about as flat as the Yankee lineup. Anyway here’s a stat. In 484 career at bats with RISP Gallo is batting .198. So let’s bat him cleanup where he would be expected to come up with a RISP. Judge should have been in the lineup last night as DH. Stanton should have been batting cleanup.