Great point.You are assuming that class rankings, evaluators, and stars are as accurate (or even close) in lacrosse as they are in football or basketball. They're not. Apples to oranges.
IL has like 4 bros they send out on the recruiting trail to evaluate some events. Then their "journalists" ask the coaches, who will actually talk to them, who they like the best. They put together rankings from there.
Compare that to football and basketball where hundreds of scouts aggregate rankings by region over hundreds of evaluations at multiple camps.
Not a perfect science either way, but I think one would be fooling themselves to look at lacrosse recruiting class ranking sites and give them the same value as they would a "24/7" from football.
Call it "Cope" all you want. Virginia was 7-9 this year with multiple top ranked recruiting classes. Cornell won the natty with recruiting classes ranked in the 5-20 range. Player development? Maybe. Rankings just aren't as iron clad as the major sports? In my opinion, more likely.
compare lacrosse, with "he can get down the alley and i saw him rip one far pipe in the morning. later that day, he got a slide earlier on his sweep and hit the next guy. looks the part." ... with baseball. just one site, and they have this for 1000's of guys:You are assuming that class rankings, evaluators, and stars are as accurate (or even close) in lacrosse as they are in football or basketball. They're not. Apples to oranges.
IL has like 4 bros they send out on the recruiting trail to evaluate some events. Then their "journalists" ask the coaches, who will actually talk to them, who they like the best. They put together rankings from there.
Compare that to football and basketball where hundreds of scouts aggregate rankings by region over hundreds of evaluations at multiple camps.
Not a perfect science either way, but I think one would be fooling themselves to look at lacrosse recruiting class ranking sites and give them the same value as they would a "24/7" from football.
Call it "Cope" all you want. Virginia was 7-9 this year with multiple top ranked recruiting classes. Cornell won the natty with recruiting classes ranked in the 5-20 range. Player development? Maybe. Rankings just aren't as iron clad as the major sports? In my opinion, more likely.
Brady Booen to UVA. Another example of why I should never mention a player that SU should look at. He’s ranked #83 by Xanders.
Idc about the star amount attached to a kid, but to be this lagging in general commits is starting to get a tad worrying. I’m sure the staff is working hard, but I wonder how many are misses and how many are we just waiting to decide at this point?
Well, Maryland didn't get any 5 star recruits for the 2nd recruiting class in a row.Maryland it turns out isn't that dissapointing (pretty accurate, not sure why they were listed),
Schoonmaker related to Henry?Some recent four star commitments -
Benjamin Philips, Defense, St John's (DC) to Bucknell
Matthew Schoonmaker, Midfield, Calvert Hall (MD) to Richmond
Darcey Muegge, Midfield, WRA to Brown.
10 four stars left.
Schoonmaker related to Henry?