- Aug 23, 2013
Would be the best win that Washington has and people seem to think they are good. Hmmm, I wonder why?
[/QUOTE]Let’s try to deal in facts here, two3, not mindless snark based on your perceptions of teams. Clemson has had the most difficult conference schedule up to this point, which is partly what accounted for their early ACC struggles. They’re now playing well and ahead of us in both Kenpom and BPI (30 and 32) and right behind a supposedly top 10 Marquette team (per the laughable AP poll). Also 10 spots higher than first place PAC 12 team Washington in both. But yea, feel free to continue on with your empty snark. That’s a good win for us.
You guys have to crap on Washington to make a point? I didn't bring them up or ANYTHING about them in the tournament on whether they're deserving or not, why are you? What does Washington have to do with us claiming a it a great win against Clemson?
Who cares about the PAC 12, who cares about Washington, who cares about anything else when we're sitting here discussing Syracuse vs Clemson, you guys do because of some dumb agenda. Sounds like you guys are a tad worried, have to trash something that has no relevance to the discussion. I keep my Hop and Washington comments in Washington threads but if you want to play that game then I can play one too, before their last game Washington was ranked and rated higher than we were which was adjusted for schedules and that's with Syracuse beating Duke. Their defense is rated higher than ours, but ignore those things because it doesn't fit your agenda.
Maybe worry about your team and the direction it's going before trying to take shots at me and another team for no reason.
Didn't the mighty Clemson lose to garbage Creighton? What about garbage Nebraska? The 9th place SEC team? Get out of here, they're crap and probably looking outside the tournament instead of being in. Those are facts.