Based on the manner of the 4-0 non conference start we can say we’re “good” or at least improved/better but certainly not “very good”.
Too often in the recent past, we barely get by those teams you list above, or even lose one or two. Take away some bad calls and we’re in a couple of those other games where and without them I think we could’ve won the one (Clemson). The other two we are losing regardless, but had those calls not happened I think the momentum taken from beating Clemson and carried over would’ve made those other games at least closer.
A “very good” team overcomes all that, so clearly, we are just borderline good.
So this could have been, and can still be a "good" team with certainty going forward, but the crazy thing about Momentum and sport is the negative momentum from this three-game slide and all that was associated with it, may end up characterizing the whole season sadly as now bad with continued ineptitude, with that continuing on going forward.
We are going to find out just how good the leadership is on this team, both at the very top and within the team itself. Crap out against VT…….then that continues to carry on where we will find ourselves saying about this team, they could’ve been "good", maybe even "very good" at least on paper, but they missed the opportunity.
Come out and end up with seven or eight wins then we know we can definitively call them good. Pull out nine wins? Well then they’ve become “very good” And then the sad thing is we will be saying this now very good team could’ve been "great".