Orangeyes
R.I.P Dan
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 16,265
- Like
- 21,713
The Dream Team only did it for the Olympics, maybe 2 months to win a Gold medal."They both are guards who are best when they have the ball -- and they know it." I think this statement is a nicer way of saying, "They're both ball hogs, that only know how to dominate the ball." Why is it that talented players aren't learning how to play without the ball anymore? I think about the original Dream Team. Any of those guys could have dominated every game they played by themselves, but watching them play off of one another was a thing of beauty. That seems to be gone from NBA basketball now, with the exception of San Antonio.
Having said that, look for Dion to be the one traded.Dion's improving, Kyrie is not.
I was referring to supremely talented players that knew how to work off of one another. I don't believe Irving and Waiters are choosing not to work together. I don't think they know how. They've never learned it. The Dream Team guys knew how to do it.The Dream Team only did it for the Olympics, maybe 2 months to win a Gold medal.
A better example might be Earl "The Pearl" Monroe and Walt "Clyde" Frazier...both superstars when they hooked up and formed the NY Knicks championship backcourt in the 70's. They were willing to sacrifice for the team, but they were already established. Kyrie and Dion are from a different era- it is what it is.
that is marginally true - the advanced stats show that Dion has slightly improved and Kyrie has slightly declined -it is (a) a small sample size and (b) neither change looks significant.Dion's improving, Kyrie is not.
the rumor in LA is that, unless the Lakers nab the #1 overall pick (and maybe even if they do), they will offer their pick to the Cavs for Kyrie.Having said that, look for Dion to be the one traded.
that is marginally true - the advanced stats show that Dion has slightly improved and Kyrie has slightly declined -it is (a) a small sample size and (b) neither change looks significant.
and Kyrie is still the much better player with the much higher upside
the rumor in LA is that, unless the Lakers nab the #1 overall pick (and maybe even if they do), they will offer their pick to the Cavs for Kyrie.
Who knows? It's Cleveland.Having said that, look for Dion to be the one traded.
All due respect but how do you know this to be the case? The word is they get along great OFF the court, just can't co-exist on it. Where and when did you see either one make the leaps & assumptions you make in your statement?I don't think it's a case of being ball hogs as much as they just both don't like each other. To Dion, Kyrie isn't good enough to definitively be "The Man" over him (If Dion played with a different kind of player, a Love, KD, Kobe, whatever, he wouldn't be acting like this) and to Kyrie, Dion is nothing but a scorer who's trying to take "his team" away.
I would definitely take that bet(If Dion played with a different kind of player, a Love, KD, Kobe, whatever, he wouldn't be acting like this)
that's another bet I'll takeDion will be in the conversation for best player at his position by the end of next year. He's be 1st team all star soon after.
People forget how ambitious Dion is. In his 2nd year he is becoming a 20ppg player. He's becoming mature BECAUSE he's beginning to realize he needs to be in order to become the player he wants to be. You always put your chips on the ambitious guy. Always.
People keep saying "you don't build around Dion" or "Kyrie has the higher upside". Kyrie will never have the ambition Dion has, a rare level that only the best players have. So in my mind, Kyrie isn't even close to having the upside that Dion has. Only because he lacks the willpower and drive to be great like Dion does. Or at least not on the same level.
Dion will be in the conversation for best player at his position by the end of next year. He's be 1st team all star soon after. Then...he still won't feel like he's good enough.
"They both are guards who are best when they have the ball -- and they know it." I think this statement is a nicer way of saying, "They're both ball hogs, that only know how to dominate the ball." Why is it that talented players aren't learning how to play without the ball anymore? I think about the original Dream Team. Any of those guys could have dominated every game they played by themselves, but watching them play off of one another was a thing of beauty. That seems to be gone from NBA basketball now, with the exception of San Antonio.
Because they both dominate off the dribble.
Does that exclude them from learning how to play away from the ball?Because they both dominate off the dribble.
Does that exclude them from learning how to play away from the ball?
All due respect but how do you know this to be the case? The word is they get along great OFF the court, just can't co-exist on it. Where and when did you see either one make the leaps & assumptions you make in your statement?
Also, Kyrie is the more "talented" player, IMO. But he's injury-prone and that kinda player is usually the most frustrating to watch, since they just can't be depended on. If I'm the Cavs I look to trade Kyrie, get as much as possible, then try to move on w/ Dion. Kyrie might turn out to be that pretty girl who never puts out...attractive as hell, but nothing more.
regardless of how weak or strong the position is, Dion is still a 2nd tier offensive SG who doesn't defend. The claim that he'll be 1st team all star in a couple of years is Igor-level hyperbole.That's the impression I got when those player meetings and stuff happened back in December.
Also Moqui seems unaware how weak the 2 is in the NBA right now.