forgot about himAdd Dwight Freeney to your list. He will be in the Hall of Fame someday.
forgot about himAdd Dwight Freeney to your list. He will be in the Hall of Fame someday.
Bunch of great players thereIn 2003 MN had their first 10 win season since 1903...Understand we have not been very good since 2003 (not 1903) (Dwight Freeney) and the mid 90's (McNabb, Harrison, Kevin Johnson, Konrad, etc.) But you have to know about John Mackey, Jim Brown, Art Monk, Ernie Davis, Floyd Little, Joe Morris, Larry Csonka, Moose Johnston, Gary Anderson, Rob Moore, Quadry Ismael, Don McPherson, Marvin Graves?
The move to the ACC will help us return to a top 25 program in time, the Big East killed us for years (good luck with Rutgers and Maryland). Everything is cyclical look how long Bama was down as was Miami as is Nebraska, etc...
Its mediocre honestly. Once we're inside the 2 our coaches love the QB sneak which is why we have so many rushing TDs with our QBs. We don't have a real redzone target WR right now and none that can get open consistently right now and our best receiving threat is our RS frosh TE. So we generally try to pound it in when we get in the redzone with mixed results. Cobb has a tendency to dance a little bit in the hole as he's a patient, find the hole type of back but on the goal line that's led to some negative plays. If we played well in the RZ we'd have beaten MSU but it's been a struggle.
Just so we're up front about it: We played Penn State and NW out of conference, while you played UNLV and SJSU. Now, I realize you guys beat those B1G teams - but I think we can agree that if you added two BCS level schools in place of those two - there'd be a chance you'd end up with two more losses. 6-6.
Well yes of course if we played better teams there'd be a better chance that we'd lose those games. There's also a chance that we'd win those games especially if they were of the same quality of teams as PSU and NW. Who knows. Also for as much as some have tried to call MN 'self inflated' it seems that some (not all) Cuse fans are really getting offended by a fan saying they were hoping to play a tougher team. That's not disrespect to Cuse, its a mere reflection on the record and wishing our favorite team would get an opponent that would bring more national attention as well as getting a chance to 'play up' a level to earn respect. I don't think any rational fan thinks this game is a push over as Cuse is a bowl eligible team from a major conference and that's never easy. Not to mention that we've played 2 tough games with you in the last 5 years already. That's part of the reason for the 'meh' as we've already played you twice and wanted someone different which is part of the fun of bowl games. Shoot the same could be said for you guys. If MN fans got the bowl they wanted and you guys got matched with Iowa, Nebraska or Michigan I doubt many of you would be upset you didn't get to play MN. Shoot I'd bet most of you would take those matchups in a heartbeat over us. Why? Because those are higher profile programs that would give you more of a 'boost' by beating. If you beat MN you'll feel good but who will care nationally? Who will say 'man we better look out for Cuse since they beat MN'? Probably nobody. Same for us. It would've been more of a 'boost' for us to play and beat an SEC team or a BC team with a Heisman candidate and that's all folks are saying. Don't take it so personal.
Well yes of course if we played better teams there'd be a better chance that we'd lose those games. There's also a chance that we'd win those games especially if they were of the same quality of teams as PSU and NW. Who knows. Also for as much as some have tried to call MN 'self inflated' it seems that some (not all) Cuse fans are really getting offended by a fan saying they were hoping to play a tougher team. That's not disrespect to Cuse, its a mere reflection on the record and wishing our favorite team would get an opponent that would bring more national attention as well as getting a chance to 'play up' a level to earn respect. I don't think any rational fan thinks this game is a push over as Cuse is a bowl eligible team from a major conference and that's never easy. Not to mention that we've played 2 tough games with you in the last 5 years already. That's part of the reason for the 'meh' as we've already played you twice and wanted someone different which is part of the fun of bowl games. Shoot the same could be said for you guys. If MN fans got the bowl they wanted and you guys got matched with Iowa, Nebraska or Michigan I doubt many of you would be upset you didn't get to play MN. Shoot I'd bet most of you would take those matchups in a heartbeat over us. Why? Because those are higher profile programs that would give you more of a 'boost' by beating. If you beat MN you'll feel good but who will care nationally? Who will say 'man we better look out for Cuse since they beat MN'? Probably nobody. Same for us. It would've been more of a 'boost' for us to play and beat an SEC team or a BC team with a Heisman candidate and that's all folks are saying. Don't take it so personal.
I'll give you that argument, I guess. Given our record we were pretty pleased to see anyone from a BCS level conference. The crazy thing is had we won the 1 point loss to Pitt - we'd be in an ACC affiliated bowl and it would all be a moot point.
I will say any bowl win against a BCS school is a good win for the program - and if you guys take us lightly, or play like we're that much worse than you - watch out. We'd much rather take the small accolades found in beating a middle of the road B1G team over losing any day. I'd imagine you want the same for your guys over a middle of the road ACC school.
UNLV and SJSU are better than NCState and Wake Forest. I'd be comfortable in saying if we swapped those games, we'd have the same record as we do now.
And just to clarify, I think MN-Syracuse are extremely even. I just don't like diminishing their record.
I doubt our coaches and players will take Cuse lightly. Most of the guys playing played a tough game at home against you guys last year for one so its almost like playing a conference opponent (and don't think for a second the coaches aren't bringing that up). Second the staff has been preaching the importance of getting that 9th win which is unfortunately a rarity for our program. Also while this team is much improved we're not a team that's been blowing folks out or has any reason to think they can just walk in and beat anyone by showing up. The NW game was close. The Nebraska game was competitive and they mounted a bit of a comeback late. We were killing Indiana 35-13 and they came all the way back to take a 38-35 lead on us. We've competed well with really good teams like WI and MSU but we haven't done anything this year for our team to have any sort of overconfidence. We're not FSU vs NIU last year. Plus we've lost 2 in a row, 2 games they thought they could win but just didn't execute offensively against 2 very good, senior laden defenses so they'll have plenty of motivation. Lastly they went to this bowl last year and lost so you know they're preaching the 'take the next step' message
He's going to get eaten by a hawk soonAsk a Gopher Fan (and receive legit responses)
so if a gopher sees his shadow on new years day…what does that portend ?
How about not cherry picking our worst ACC teams and going with Penn State/NW equivalents?
How about and Maryland and BC? (Penn State was odd this year, no? And no BCS rankings for them due to NCAA) ... But I don't think either BC or MD are rollovers.
Now the losses. Realistically, Syracuse had 3 more shots at winnable games in Penn State, Pittsburgh and Northwestern to match the Gopher's 8 wins.
Gophers (51)
Michigan State (7)
Wisconsin (10)
Iowa (29)
Michigan (38)
Syracuse (68)
Florida State (1)
Clemson (16)
Georgia Tech (33)
Penn State (54)
Pittsburgh (59)
Northwestern (65)
Trueblue25 said:Unfortunately we faced the pre OSU Northwestern team, who was much better and healthier than they were after the OSU game. We should have beaten PSU, I'm still pissed about that. Maybe if we went with TH we may have won, oh well in the past . Pittsburgh's a rival, you win some you lose some.
Same here. And the BTN announcers can suck but nobody's worse than the Pam Ward/Joey Galloway grouping
Gopher fan here. I've skimmed your board and also seen convos on our respective SBN sites and figured I'd offer a MN perspective and give real, accurate responses to some of your questions about the team other than just pointing out stats and the like. Thanks for allowing me on your board and I promise I'm not a troll nor a delusional homer (seriously, I pinky swear). A few brief points regarding some common themes:
- IGNORE PANTHERHAWK. Seriously the guy is an anti MN troll that spams the boards of all of our non big ten opponents (he's been banned from most B1G sites) and is seriously chemically imbalanced or something. He'll post newspaper articles about any crime within 30 minutes of campus and generally try to get folks riled up for no reason. google pantherhawk and enjoy the pictures of him and his lightsaber.
- Regarding fan apathy for the Texas Bowl and Cuse: Seriously its nothing personal. We played in this bowl last year at 6-6 and TT fans said the same things about us ('seriously our reward is a boring 6-6 MN team?'). This year we were a much better team than last year and so fans hoped for a better bowl and a 'better' (ie higher profile or better record) opponent. So its really a combination of fans being disappointed at being jumped in the fake bowl pecking order by teams like Michigan as well as playing in the same bowl and then playing a 6-6 team which as well all know is the bare minimum record for a bowl game. As a MN fan we've had plenty of years where we've been that 6-6 team so its definitely not a shot, just that fans wanted to play someone new and someone even more challenging. This isn't to say that Cuse won't be a difficult game but the average Rube was hoping for a fringe top 25 type of opponent. Also add in the fact that we've played Cuse twice in the last few years and its like playing a bowl game against NW, a team we play occasionally anyway without a huge national profile.
- Ignore all MN media articles from The Star Tribune and most from the Pioneer Press. If you see the names Reusse or Souhan or any of our local radio hosts just ignore. MPLS is a Vikings/Twins/Wild/Wolves town and the local media hacks generally give MN football only fringe attention and they usually have no idea what they're talking about and they're overly synical and negative. Our local Gopher beat guys and blogs are really good along with the Rivals and 247 sites. ESPN1500 does a decent job as well. So if you see any of those guys dissing Cuse just ignore it because all they're doing is setting up a snarky negative column if we lose or don't dominate. They do it every year. They'll say 'if the Gophers want us to care then go beat MSU' and then diss the team for losing or 'if the Gophers want us to care they'll beat NW by 3 touchdowns' then diss the team if they win by 2 TDs OR they'll proclaim them great if they meet expectations and then say they should go undefeated the rest of the way. Basically set unrealistic expectations so they always have something to criticize
Oh I knew she was there this year and she did a fine job. My point was specifically that Pam Ward is terribleActually, it's Syracuse native Beth Mowins who did the ESPN2 nooner this season. But no one is holding it against you for not being able to tell the difference.
Thanks for your contributions to the threadDoes Minnesota even bother having a trophy case that would hold the Brown Jug, or do they just not even get delusions of winning it?
Oh I knew she was there this year and she did a fine job. My point was specifically that Pam Ward is terrible
Thanks for your contributions to the thread
Goldy said:I know all about losing to our rivals! It just makes the wins sweeter. But my point stands, we've got the same amount of cupcake wins.
Now the losses. Realistically, Syracuse had 3 more shots at winnable games in Penn State, Pittsburgh and Northwestern to match the Gopher's 8 wins.
Gophers (51)
Michigan State (7)
Wisconsin (10)
Iowa (29)
Michigan (38)
Syracuse (68)
Florida State (1)
Clemson (16)
Georgia Tech (33)
Penn State (54)
Pittsburgh (59)
Northwestern (65)