elimunelson
Solvay Fanatic
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 6,429
- Like
- 13,175
I understand the premise of your post, and it's certainly admirable. But here's the thing, the reason why SU keeps an iota of 'perspective' is simply because they don't have the money. It's like trying to compare the garden variety Vegas gambler playing at the $5 poker table vs. the $5000 one. Perhaps, they'd like to give it a shot if they could, but simply can't afford to do so due to the relative risk/reward factors. It's rather convenient to fall back on this 'perspective' sentiment, especially when one doesn't have the ability, means, fame, status, etc. to participate otherwise.
Interesting how your school has kept perspective on this front, but how about perspective in regards to charging students the same amount for classes/tuition without the physical classroom instruction, experiences, etc. that encompassed these charges?
My school and every other school in America is still charging the same price of admission. We are no different in that regard. That's the cost of doing business in higher learning right now. This may change but we're not in the business of discounting the main thrust of what Syracuse University is in business to do, which is educate.
I think the argument to be made is SU basketball. That is a top 10 program where we will find out shortly if we're operating like an SEC football school in regards to the success sans Jim Boeheim. I happen to think we operate more intelligently than quasi professional programs in the SEC and give guys their proper up and down years to make a qualified judgement on a change. Gus was given zero leeway and it is what it is.