Big East never recognized in the preseason ever it seems like. However...always represented at the end of the year and that's all that really counts....,
My point is...Syracuse hasn't been in the preseason Top 25 in seemingly forever. Yet you're making fun of the other Big East teams because they also aren't in the preseason Top 25 this season?
We went 1-6 just a season ago for cripe's sake.
I understand the many advantages of joining the ACC, but it is extremely sad to me that that's what we've lowered ourselves to...celebrating over the accomplishments of our peers. I was fine doing that for a three or four year span because I believed that it was only temporary. It's gone on way longer than it should.
No Stony Brook? Man, the polls are such a joke.47 teams got votes.
Six from our schedule:
3. USC
27. Louisville
29. Cincy
34. USF
41(t). RU
43(t). Mizzou
NR: Northwestern, Pitt, Minny, UConn, Temple, Stony Brook
Louisville and Cincinnati are close, and Boise is in at 22. So there's that.
ACC has 3- FSU (7), Clemson (14) VPI (20). I'm really going to have to get used to cheering for these schools OOC as I don't really like Clemson or FSU and hate VPI. Hopefully FSU's performance actually matches their expectations this time, but I'm not counting on it. Same with Clemson.
How in god's green earth does Rutgers....with an entirely new coaching staff made up of leftovers and 2nd hand help...get picked above us? That boggles my mind.
If you're not in it from the get-go you'll never make it to the top at the end.Big East never recognized in the preseason ever it seems like. However...always represented at the end of the year and that's all that really counts.
Why shouldn't I think Syracuse can beat the 6 no votes and rut? And maybe shittyfla and mizzou??47 teams got votes.
Six from our schedule:
3. USC
27. Louisville
29. Cincy
34. USF
41(t). RU
43(t). Mizzou
NR: Northwestern, Pitt, Minny, UConn, Temple, Stony Brook
Like I was saying...
What were you saying?
How in god's green earth does Rutgers....with an entirely new coaching staff made up of leftovers and 2nd hand help...get picked above us? That boggles my mind.
How in god's green earth does Rutgers....with an entirely new coaching staff made up of leftovers and 2nd hand help...get picked above us? That boggles my mind.
I'll try to make the case...
We lost Sanu early to the draft on offense which is huge. He was awesome. That said, we return a bunch of talent at receiver including Coleman and Harrison. We return our top two backs, our top FB, our top 2 QB's, we return a few starters on the OL and bring in a 5th year Sr. and 3 year starter from Maryland at RT. We also return every TE.
On defense we will be very good and have ABE players at every level. Not every position, but every level including reigning BE Defensive Player of the Year, OLB Khaseem Green. Our MLB is a 3 year starter and the other OLB is only a true soph, Kevin Snyder. He was terrific last year. Our secondary was just ranked in the top 10 by ESPN.
As for the coaching staff, we lost a group of dynamic recruiters, but overall, the coaching itself was not Schiano & Co's strong suit. Sure Flood is an unknown as a head coach but that can all change this year if he is able to accomlish what Schiano couldn't do in a decade.
Anyway, we'll see. I'm curious to see how Flood does.