Big Ten Discussing $2 Billion Private Capital Deal | Page 6 | Syracusefan.com
.

Big Ten Discussing $2 Billion Private Capital Deal

The advice to play the long game when schools often cannot see beyond tomorrow is spot on. Especially in the B1G. Example: they too Maryland, sure it gave the ACC a black eye but Maryland has not really been impressive. Still not fiscally sound. Just another mouth to feed. Example: Rutgers. Need I say more? Terrible facilities. Mismanagement of the AD. Teams are body bag games. Borrowed money, still paying it back. Runs in the red in spite of making more TV money than ever before
 
Last edited:
This makes no sense. Michigan and USC should just go Indy in that case. Or even start talking to the SEC.
When they first announced their opposition to this there were some noises that they would go independent and try to get a TV deal like ND has. But I wonder how the existing grant of rights agreement would affect that.
 
When they first announced their opposition to this there were some noises that they would go independent and try to get a TV deal like ND has. But I wonder how the existing grant of rights agreement would affect that.

The current TV deals are already in place until 2029. So I don't think the BTE company can even start until 2030. The GOR is until 2035. I am sure Michigan and USC can get out of that, especially with the now ACC precedent. Also I would venture that they have a good legal challenge given the BTE was not the intent of the original GOR.

If the playoff expands again, both would only need to be Top 15 to keep all of the playoff money should they go Indy.

Worst case both can join the SEC, even if FB only. The SEC can easily add Arizona State, BYU, Colorado which are closer than Oregon and Washington for USC.
 
When they first announced their opposition to this there were some noises that they would go independent and try to get a TV deal like ND has. But I wonder how the existing grant of rights agreement would affect that.
As the new investment and partnership was not a fundamental part of the original BTN agreement, I would guess that the existing agreements would only stand as applied to UM and USC if they each ratify the agreement. Either or both should be able to leave with less hassle than Most other schools leaving a conference before their present agreements.

What the ACC and SEC should be doing is asking ESPN how each/both would affect their deals. Either conference would weaken Fox' deal and the BTN would lose value while ESPN, via the SEC and/or the ACC would gain value. Further, the ACC can offer an ND-style deal to either or both teams.

Though, I don't think either UM or USC carry the national presence that ND has and my guess is that conference affiliation is preferred. That remains to be seen by the numbers guys, as I said, it is just a guess.

Anyway, the times, they are interesting, to be sure.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,036
Messages
5,200,193
Members
6,165
Latest member
Nnelg

Online statistics

Members online
216
Guests online
1,926
Total visitors
2,142


...
Top Bottom