This thread is off the charts hysterical.
I've spent years on one side if a reporters microphone or the other, I can assure you all that for every 100 people who are willing to praise an individual on the record, there is less than 1 willing to attach their name to calling someone a dick.
It's just human nature.
And it dawns on me that some people commenting here might not realize that when a reporter quotes "unnamed sources" that the reporter actually knows the source, and is just refusing to publicly out the person.
I think some here think the reporter is citing a friend of a friend of a friend, and doesn't know exactly who the person is. I mean if that's your impression, there's no use continuing a debate.