OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 226,554
- Like
- 405,460
Glad to see Bing stayed on there.
No way...most of them should have made it over Rodman
No way...
I like all the players on the list, but Rodman was integral to 5 chips on two teams. I'm not talking Robert Horry type rings, he was a critical piece to each. He was crazy off the court, but none of them have his resume on the court..way
most of them should have made it over Rodman
I like all the players on the list, but Rodman was integral to 5 chips on two teams. I'm not talking Robert Horry type rings, he was a critical piece to each. He was crazy off the court, but none of them have his resume on the court..
Damn... "A joke" is pretty hard core.. Different teams different roles.. But, I would say Klay and Draymond have better resumes then those guys too to be honest.Rodman is a joke. Who is more important to their championship teams, Klay Thompson or Rodman?
If you’re going to put Rodman on there you may as well have put Draymond on there.
Damn... "A joke" is pretty hard core.. Different teams different roles.. But, I would say Klay and Draymond have better resumes then those guys too to be honest.
Def a good argument!!The players left off just show me how many fantastic players there have been.
To me, the biggest snub is Dwight Howard. By a lot, actually. As I said in the official NBA thread... in his prime, he was elite on D and not far behind that on O given his position and how strong he was inside. The numbers speak for themselves, and so do the accolades (3x DPOY, 8x all NBA).
Shocking to me he is not on this list.
View attachment 209275