Bryant selfish? | Page 3 | Syracusefan.com

Bryant selfish?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The kind of selfish he is being, is the same kind we are everyday. We selfishly put ourselves through college, to earn more than others. We work extra, to selfishly provide for our family. We selfishly root for our own children, in the hopes that they will be happy. In that context, then yes, he's being selfish, and thank goodness, I'm selfish , everyday.. Good for him.

More or less. Except others, who do not intrinsically benefit from that selfishness, also rely upon him in this case, to a degree. If I am unhappy at work, for whatever reason, or simply decide to pursue another opportunity that is better for me, that could negatively impact my employer, coworkers, and clients. They have invested in me and rely upon me, to different extents. They don't have to be happy about my selfish decision, but in the end, if its best for me and mine, I'm going to do it.
 
They both had nearly the same number of passing attempts when Bryant left ... that doesn't fly ... it was 60 for Lawrence and 54 for Bryant. Lawrence is a better passer at the end of the day and it isn't even close.
When Bryant was in they would run the ball in for touch downs. With him and Etienne, why would you pass in the red zone.
 
Your team has elite talent all over the field. But I have seen many equally talented team stumble and lose to average teams who play together, for each other. Hard to believe that's truly the state of affairs in the Clemson locker room.
State of affairs means we have a back up qb we can win with against a good team like 'cuse? Yea...I'll take it.
 
Dabo did the kid a solid, and he respected him as a person, first. He gave him a chance to fulfill any NFL dreams, if he has them. Many coaches may not have. I think that goes a long way in the locker room. I respect both of their decisions.

*this*
 
State of affairs means we have a back up qb we can win with against a good team like 'cuse? Yea...I'll take it.
Denial is nut going to cover up the torn up team chemistry. You know what kind of guy Bryant is.
 
Denial is nut going to cover up the torn up team chemistry. You know what kind of guy Bryant is.

I don't care one way or the other, but if they go undefeated the rest of the year, I assume you'll be back to admit you were wrong....
 
I don't care one way or the other, but if they go undefeated the rest of the year, I assume you'll be back to admit you were wrong...
Sounds reasonable. Let's see what happens this week at Wake.
 
Denial of what? That our 3rd team qb was able to beat a good team after a week of distractions? By all accounts Bryant is a great kid that made a decision he found best.

All accounts are the sr leaders all have fully supported TL and Brice since the change.

Our defense was outstanding after the first period and our 3rd team kid came through at QB in the clutch.

Teams with issues don't usually pull together like that.

Who knows, maybe wake is better than you guys. I personally do not think so but alas...gotta play the game.
 
i don't see a path back for him. bridge burned. but if the team says ok why not ? their decision in the end.
 
Last edited:
Denial of what? That our 3rd team qb was able to beat a good team after a week of distractions? By all accounts Bryant is a great kid that made a decision he found best.

All accounts are the sr leaders all have fully supported TL and Brice since the change.

Our defense was outstanding after the first period and our 3rd team kid came through at QB in the clutch.

Teams with issues don't usually pull together like that.

Who knows, maybe wake is better than you guys. I personally do not think so but alas...gotta play the game.
I think Wake will be more aggressive on offense at home. The SU offensive game plan seemed too cautious, but it came down to 1 score at Death Valley so I can't really be too critical.
 
I think Wake will be more aggressive on offense at home. The SU offensive game plan seemed too cautious, but it came down to 1 score at Death Valley so I can't really be too critical.

Considering how wrong you have been on 'team chemistry' this past week... coming back with an opinion on your play calling seems to be a better angle to work. Good move.
 
Considering how wrong you have been on 'team chemistry' this past week... coming back with an opinion on your play calling seems to be a better angle to work. Good move.
People always try to put the best face on stuff like that. Give it time.
 
You mean time to have a 3rd team nobody step up? Lol... you hold on to that. We may lose a game...or two... but will not be due to chemistry.
 
You mean time to have a 3rd team nobody step up? Lol... you hold on to that. We may lose a game...or two... but will not be due to chemistry.

Feel free to go back to TigerNet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
172,066
Messages
4,992,988
Members
6,021
Latest member
OldeOstrom

Online statistics

Members online
93
Guests online
2,072
Total visitors
2,165


...
Top Bottom