That's an odd post. Elvir was a good 3 point shooter. Why wouldn't you take him?I would honestly take Elvir Ovcina from three than these two. I'm not kidding.
That's an odd post. Elvir was a good 3 point shooter. Why wouldn't you take him?I would honestly take Elvir Ovcina from three than these two. I'm not kidding.
He still needs to play even if he can't hit a 3
You let offensive players settle in by keeping them in the game for 5 minutes. defensive players more often can be used better then offensive ones for short 2-3 minute stretches, presses, and quick mismatch set pieces to get a easy bucket.
maybe, Buss should work on his shooting more then his d in practice.
That's an odd post. Elvir was a good 3 point shooter. Why wouldn't you take him?
He was 3-for-5 in an exhibition game...and he's 5-of-28 when it counts. That's not kicking him when he's down, it's merely pointing out the fact that he's not a good shooter. He's not even a streaky shooter. That 3-for-5 performance was the anomaly here. He brings some things to the table, but shooting absolutely is not one of them right now.It never ceases to amaze me how fans like to kick out players when they are down. For sure, that shot was epic "brickian" but come on... Buss was 3 for 5 in an exhibition game where nobody else could even sniff the rim from the 3. He has taken some ill advised shots but he doesn't deserve to be completely thrown under the bus. (oops.. that was completely unintended)
There have been plenty of epic bricks launched thus far this season and we haven't seen the end of them. Patterson provides some valuable aspects to the team and defensively at the top of the zone his play is amazing to watch. As for BJ... he is supposed to be a "shooter" so his bricks being highlighted is perhaps a bit less egregious but he is a freshman who has had REALLY limited playing time and I'd be willing to bet he is less than "comfortable" out there when he is put in the game. The day will come when it's likely he will be one of, if not the best shooter from 3 that we have.
Given... but (and playing devil's advocate here) there have been periods of time when some of our best 3 pt. shooters historically have had similar poor streaks. 28 shots is not really a large enough sample size to come to a definitive conclusion with respect to what type of shooter someone is over the long haul.He was 3-for-5 in an exhibition game...and he's 5-of-28 when it counts. That's not kicking him when he's down, it's merely pointing out the fact that he's not a good shooter. He's not even a streaky shooter. That 3-for-5 performance was the anomaly here. He brings some things to the table, but shooting absolutely is not one of them right now.
Flacusian said:My point is that people can be so quick to criticize a player when they make a gaffe and within the context of insinuating the gaffe is indicative of their larger overall play.
Given... but (and playing devil's advocate here) there have been periods of time when some of our best 3 pt. shooters historically have had similar poor streaks. 28 shots is not really a large enough sample size to come to a definitive conclusion with respect to what type of shooter someone is over the long haul.
I too, can be counted among those who are of the belief that Ron Patterson is not for the most part a player that we want taking 3 point shots. My point is that people can be so quick to criticize a player when they make a gaffe and within the context of insinuating the gaffe is indicative of their larger overall play.
And you could even extend it back to last year, when he was just 6-of-19 on the year. That's 11-of-47 overall, for anyone keeping track at home. I think that's a big enough sample size to determine that he's not a particularly gifted jump shooter.Their bad streaks were surrounded by good streaks.
And you can't point out how well he did in a single exhibition game and then say that 28 shots in 13 regular season games is not a relevant sample.
jekelish said:And you could even extend it back to last year, when he was just 6-of-19 on the year. That's 11-of-47 overall, for anyone keeping track at home. I think that's a big enough sample size to determine that he's not a particularly gifted jump shooter.
Why? No good reason for him to play in a meaningful game. Never has been.He still needs to play even if he can't hit a 3
He did catch the lower left corner of the backboard.
cto said:I was at the game. I and the people with me all cheered encouragement for Buss every time he got the ball or made a play on D. We wanted him to succeed... and we wanted him to know we wanted him to succeed. Sounds like some folks here are ready to write him off.
Which would be fine that he's not a good jump shooter, if that's the case, can he shoot from mid range? Can he drive? I mean, nobody knows, he shoots from three and that's about it.
His passing and handling is suspect. I'm honestly confused to where we go with him.
Buss seems like the most likable guy on the team if you ask me. He has the genuine smile, he hustles, he looks like a good kid and I want nothing but success for him. But I feel bad for him, the way this season is going and one top 30 and one top 80 recruit coming in over him is going to crush even the little playing time he is getting now.
The three point shot is 90% of his offensive game, to go with a suspect handle and the occasional nice pass in transition. On the defensive side he's an average defender who covers solid ground but gets blown by as much as the next guy.
Remember when people were saying he should play over Cooney and citing his ability to knock down threes? Ha, good times.
Apparently I'm blind...i think he has been playing pretty well. On offense he has settled down and is running the offense. He isn't just bombing away when he's out there anymore. Hes looking to distribute the ball and swing it to the right guy. He also makes stronger passes than the floaters passes Joseph throws. The threes he took were not forced and he has looked to make passes. Hopefully he works on his shooting before and after practice and they start to fall. He had some assists and looked to feed the post. he isn't going to come in offensively and do anything out of the ordinary because he doesn't have the leash to do so.
I actually enjoy watching him play up top in the zone with cooney. They both move well together and have active hands. He also is pysical enough to get around a screen. When joseph is on defense Cooney has to over compensate too much to help joseph out. I personally feel Joseph is a bad defender in the zone and puts the other guys in bad spots to help him. I'm actually happy JB is playing mike strictly at forward and have Ron be the third guard. 5 or 6 minutes a half are good minutes for him and gives joseph a breather. I'm on the Buss