There might be a possibility where they've been told they are getting scholarships back on the appeal, but it hasn't been made public yet.What are the other possibilities?
I read that tweet as @cusesigel ASSUMING that based on Chukwu signing that the staff feels there will be a reduction, not that he has talked to the staff. Anyone else read it that way? Will that happen and does this signing imply that? I hope he's right, but that's not how I read it.Here's one:
https://twitter.com/hashtag/OrangeRecruiting?src=hash
Cusesigel (from Nunes) is the author ... apparently quoting sources on the SU staff indicating that they expect a reduction of at least one in the scholarship limits on appeal.
Forget about the number of Skips. i
I read that tweet as @cusesigel ASSUMING that based on Chukwu signing that the staff feels there will be a reduction, not that he has talked to the staff. Anyone else read it that way? Will that happen and does this signing imply that? I hope he's right, but that's not how I read it.
So let me get this straight.
In 2016/2017 we could be looking at a lineup of...
Battle/Joseph/Howard
Richardson/Joseph/Howard
Roberson/Moyer/Richardson
Lydon/Roberson/Moyer
Chukwu/(Obokoh/Coleman)
My god.
That is a squad and a half.
That would really be the best outcome - we get a scholarship back, thus allowing the penalties to begin immediately. I just don't think they'd lop a year off too, but getting that scholarship back would be a big deal.the NCAA will allow us to have 11 scholarships moving forward (which means we could even start the sanctions this season),
If that's the case then I assume any Battle commitment would closely on the heels of a public announcement of the appeal result.I would expect a successful appeal...to reduce the scholarship punishment by one. No one has to leave.
Jesus and we have the moose looking fella, my b for forgettingWhat do you have against Diagne?!? :rolling:
Cheers,
Neil
The best part is, look how young that team is! We are set for a few years and if/when we land Battle, that is just icing on the proverbial cake.So let me get this straight.
In 2016/2017 we could be looking at a lineup of...
Battle/Joseph/Howard
Richardson/Joseph/Howard
Roberson/Moyer/Richardson
Lydon/Roberson/Moyer
Chukwu/(Obokoh/Coleman)
My god.
That is a squad and a half.
Trueblue25 said:Jesus and we have the moose looking fella, my b for forgetting Battle Richardson Roberson Lydon Diagne/Chukwu Would that be accurate? Moyer being a Kris Joseph like 6th man I suppose?
POSSIBLE 16-17 line up, if everything works out.
Battle 6'7
Richardson 6'6
Lyden 6'9
Roberson 6'8
Chukwu 7'2
With a bench of
Howard 6'5 (capable of subbing in for either Battle or Richardson)
Diagne 6'8 (capable of subbing in for either Lyden or Roberson, with Roberson moving to small forward when Lyden goes out)
Coleman 6'9 (capable of subbing in for Chukwu)
A lof of "ifs"there. We don't yet have Battle, and this scenario requires all 4 incoming freshmen to be contributors by their sophomore year (which is probably statistically unlikely), but still, its great to have something like this to hope for. That is a HUGE team which on paper will have size, ball handling, shooting, low post scoring, size, defense, rebounding, depth, size, one-and-done star power, veterans, and size. Everything you'd want in a college basketball team.
Wouldn't complain if he did have that kind of season. Thinking he'll be a 12-13 and 9 guy which would probably still get him in the draft potentially.I think if Roberson has a 15/8 type season he will be NBA bound. I also think Moyer is a starter.
Moyer...?