Well, that's ... unfortunate
Seems at least one alum isn't happy about the way things have been shaking on the recruiting trail -
Agree, he seems like someone who lost his status many years ago. He is constantly hammering the staff, which while they may deserve some of it, certainly doesn't help his influence. That said, between the women losing the #1 recruit, men losing Parlette, and Football losing Nunn, this has been a painful few weeks.Its a bad development to lose a guy like Parlette but Beardsley doesn't move the needle on the hill one bit.
That's unfortunate to hear... its time for the needle to start moving when you get decommits from two top 50 players in a class.Its a bad development to lose a guy like Parlette but Beardsley doesn't move the needle on the hill one bit.
With nothing to prove this by, other than my 10,000 ft perspective, he seems a bit disinterested. He gets into the tourney yearly and does well in the ACC. Truly something is missing though, as we continue to struggle in the tournament against teams we should beat. As you said, something needs to change. Could it be, he is just no longer fully engaged. How long can someone keep that competitive drive? Guy has been around forever. Very similar to JB, and many of our fears on the hoops side over the last several years.That's unfortunate to hear... its time for the needle to start moving when you get decommits from two top 50 players in a class.
I thought the new recruiting rules were going to help SU, all its done has delay decommits, who were originally ours.
IMO, Desko has done a flat out horrible job of running the program starting in May 2015, when we had by far the best roster, top to bottom in college lax.
That's unfortunate to hear... its time for the needle to start moving when you get decommits from two top 50 players in a class.
I thought the new recruiting rules were going to help SU, all its done has delay decommits, who were originally ours.
IMO, Desko has done a flat out horrible job of running the program starting in May 2015, when we had by far the best roster, top to bottom in college lax.
Any more you can add to this?Our AD is definitely looking for Desko to get more involved in recruiting and show better results so this is definitely going to put more pressure on him.
Any more you can add to this?
I recall many here (and IL) being very excited about the 2013 and 2014 recruiting classes believing Cuse had struck recruiting gold only to later bash the same. Takes time to recover from poor drafts in any sport but the last three recruiting classes have been good despite the usual gripes. Cuse relies more on references of field contacts than magazine ratings.
Think a blind man and the AD could clearly see that 18 ' was a year of transition highlighted by our top four mids being a soph with 3 frosh yet Desko went out and scheduled an even tougher SOS unconcerned about his w/l record or job. Respect.
Desko has been involved at later stages as as a closer with every recruit that I know but it's logical that he may be asked to attend more recruiting events, expand network of hs and club contacts and perhaps even be the first contact simply because the field has widened.
Syracuse has its history, top notch facilities and underrated coaching stability but sorry to say that many colleges have some other advantages that Cuse has a hard time matching.
Wonder if the women's program is under any scrutiny after going 9-10.
Cost?Can you elaborate on what other advantages Cuse may have a hard time matching? Just curious, given you noted the facilities and coaching stability as positives. The fact that we play in a dome means weather shouldn't be a huge issue. I get that schools like Duke/UVA/Hopkins/UNC are better academically, but Cuse isn't Towson. I am not sure where we might be struggling, outside of not being more creative and proactive. More kids are playing the game, which means there is more talent to go around. We should be able to grab talented classes every year and have. UVA has a ton of top 10 kids and has certainly underachieved. There is more to it than just getting top kids.
Sticking to ACC but points apply to many colleges outside. Weather is certainly a factor. Id rather be hanging out on the lawn or downtown at UNC or UVA or M street during the school year? Forget Ivies who do bend for 'exceptional" as a student and future job seeker Id rather have a Duke, ND, UVA, UNC or Syracuse degree. Rather pay the out off state of UNC or UVA than Syracuse .Can you elaborate on what other advantages Cuse may have a hard time matching? Just curious, given you noted the facilities and coaching stability as positives. The fact that we play in a dome means weather shouldn't be a huge issue. I get that schools like Duke/UVA/Hopkins/UNC are better academically, but Cuse isn't Towson. I am not sure where we might be struggling, outside of not being more creative and proactive. More kids are playing the game, which means there is more talent to go around. We should be able to grab talented classes every year and have. UVA has a ton of top 10 kids and has certainly underachieved. There is more to it than just getting top kids.
He may not move the needle on the second floor at Manley, but he has a massive network within college lacrosse. Not just locally but involved heavily with NLF and numerous major clubs around the country.Its a bad development to lose a guy like Parlette but Beardsley doesn't move the needle on the hill one bit.
Its a bad development to lose a guy like Parlette but Beardsley doesn't move the needle on the hill one bit.
Does the player's ranking really matter for this conversation. He thinks he's pretty good because of his ranking and he decided he doesn't want to attend SU.We conjecture about the value of recruit ratings every year. All speculation. Has anyone done a correlation study of the relationship between ratings and team success? Maybe we could stop spinning the same wheels every year with a little mathematical help.
Don't know why you were so salty about us enjoying talking about recruiting but I got you some numbers.We conjecture about the value of recruit ratings every year. All speculation. Has anyone done a correlation study of the relationship between ratings and team success? Maybe we could stop spinning the same wheels every year with a little mathematical help.
. Good info. CuSeLax is a quant running algorithms for a hedge fund. Beers on him if we ever have a lax tailgate.Don't know why you were so salty about us enjoying talking about recruiting but I got you some numbers.
With the last 5 national champs I went back and looked to see their IL average class rank out of 20 for the four classes before their national title wins:
2018 Yale: Average class 9.5
2017 Maryland: Average class 5.25
2016 North Carolina: Average class 2.25
2015 Denver: Average class 12.5
2014 Duke: Average class 5
> all together the average class rank of these five champs is : 6.9
Cuse average class rank 2010-2018: 6.8
Cuse last 4 average class rank: 10
So we would be on the high end for class ranks for us to win this year. However as you can see from Denver it is not impossible. Clearly class ranks do matter. However this data doesn't show things like Maryland having the #1 class four years before they won the title. Some times one class could mean everything. Transfers are also not included. There is endless data to go over but when it comes down to it you need good players. Losing Parlette hurts as i believe he was one of those good players.
Ha ha my wife wanted to watch Bad Moms so it's safe to say I had a couple hours to run down some numbers.. Good info. CuSeLax is a quant running algorithms for a hedge fund. Beers on him if we ever have a lax tailgate.