OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 217,257
- Like
- 380,324
Syracuse Basketball
Evidence of the UNFAIR T-shirt. Remind us to ask about it later. pic.twitter.com/UZidkNG5
Maybe it's just me, but I don't get it.
Maybe it's me, but I don't get it.-__-
Now seriously if Nike starts selling this shirt how does anyone justify not paying the kid a dime?
he's so good it's unfair, whats not to get???Maybe it's just me, but I don't get it.
Isn't that a standard commercially available shirt [not a custom one] that Nike sells, that just happens to have coincidental relevance to CJ?
Really? Then, you may as well scrap the concept/objective of amateurism and try to establish and enforce a salary cap.
This wouldn't be too different from the Ohio State issue, where they can give their players a infinite number of 'awards' or memorabilia-related items, and the kids could sell them through any number of avenues, including through ebay, where designated alum bidders could pay inordinate amounts for worthless items. At that point, you're just throwing in the towel and telling schools 'it's up to you to be creative in how you funnel money to the 'student athletes.'
I'm still not understanding how people don't see the relationship between the athlete and the NCAA as a cooperative one. The players are getting what - $40k per year in education, plus the exposure and experiences commensurate with being a 'celebrity' on a national level. And the opportunity to advance into a high-paying professional situation. That's not enough?
Fair, in this particular instance, is aware he's not being compensated monetarily, and chooses to promote the product anyway. If HE had a problem with this, maybe we should, as well, but Nike isn't even using his actual name. Insinuation or incidental relativity of significant value are arguments you'd have to make and prove.
If there were some way to put proceeds related to things like this into a group trust, for post-graduate dispersion, I wouldn't be too against that. But, if it were on an individual basis, you'd still open things up to unscrupulous schools promising they could offer more fund generating opportunities than the next school. Then where would we be in terms of competition? Things are already not exactly 'fair.' Why make them worse?
Free markets work. And they are less corrupt than when the free market is prevented since black markets inevitably are created. The NCAA sucks, it isn't fair or just. they've done a hell of a job marketing the concept of amateurism and convincing people like you, though...so good for them I guess
When you sign an LOI, you're buying into the NCAA. If you don't like the deal, don't go to college.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
So, if a kid walks on and doesn't take a scholarship, should he be free to enter into any bargain he wants?When you sign an LOI, you're buying into the NCAA. If you don't like the deal, don't go to college.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
I maybe wrong but a quick google search shows that they are no longer available. There are some on ebay but none in Cuse colors.Isn't that a standard commercially available shirt [not a custom one] that Nike sells, that just happens to have coincidental relevance to CJ?
ExactlyIsn't that a standard commercially available shirt [not a custom one] that Nike sells, that just happens to have coincidental relevance to CJ?
Really, that's a lazy, bullshit defense of the system. Let me know when the NBA and NFL drop the requirements you need to be out of high school for X number of years before you can be drafted - the system is rigged to make sure colleges get free labor. If you're fine with that, you're willing to support big business abusing labor. College athletics is big business, and the athletes are the labor force.
And let's not forget that our zone is so good it should be illegal.he's so good it's unfair, whats not to get???
And let's not forget that our zone is so good it should be illegal.