Clemson Postgame Thoughts 2

[Cusefan0307]

My takeaway is that it took a 5th year (on another team) for JG3 to finally get in shape and become an efficient scorer.

Shooting wasn't really his issue here the past two seasons. 40 and 38% from 3. Turnover rate is way down. Clemson does not play any ISO ball.

 

[Hokie Mark]

I didn't read the entire thread, so if this was already said, I apologize, but as a casual fan just watching a good game, I came away with 2 impressions:
1) Syracuse had more talented players
2) Clemson played better "team" ball, especially on offense
IMO, a little more coaching, running some designed plays, I think Syracuse is THERE.

 

[Capt. Tuttle]

I am glad for Joe. He undeservedly took a lot of grief from Syracuse fans. He had a fine career, but likely would have been better had he been used more appropriately. His only job should ever have been hunting shots. JB wanting max shooters on the floor really played against his strengths. I hope he goes very far in the NCAA.