FAU is not an easy place to play since Dusty May. Maybe not as tough as the peak of their success, but that building is still intimate and loud.Wow nice gutty win on the road for USF and Hodgson when their offensive players were terrible
FAU is not an easy place to play since Dusty May. Maybe not as tough as the peak of their success, but that building is still intimate and loud.Wow nice gutty win on the road for USF and Hodgson when their offensive players were terrible
So GMac, Hop and Hart? Can’t think of anyone else who’d even get an interview.Alums-plural. Yes.
I’m not guessing either.I couldn't agree with your post more. I know in my case, I'm not giving my opinions on this. This is what I have been told by people that are in a position to know.
Let's just say for argument's sake that that is the perspective from all three of those players.So GMac, Hop and Hart? Can’t think of anyone else who’d even get an interview.
It’s literally Nate Oates all over again. Don’t screw it up this time.Really gutsy OT win for USF. Hodgson is making a great case to be the man.
Really gutsy OT win for USF. Hodgson is making a great case to be the man.
Schertz is a little bit distracting to the fan base. He’s great, but Hodgson is a home run candidate for Syracuse also. One big plus of Hodgson is having worked at institutions with FBS football. It’s not a knock at Schertz, but it matters to have worked in an athletic department where there is competing interests and how to navigate that.It’s literally Nate Oates all over again. Don’t screw it up this time.
I'm a "small town boy" too and I got the hell out of rural Massachusetts the second I was old enough.GMAC is a small town boy. Like Boeheim. You like what you know and feel comfortable with.
Alums-plural. Yes.
Perfectly stated. Agree on all fronts.While there are concerns, this situation is ultimately beneficial for Syracuse because there is currently no alumnus who should be seriously considered for the job.
What we have at Syracuse is a sleeping giant that needs to be awakened before our NIL situation truly improves. That reality will understandably turn some coaches away, but that says more about them than it does about Syracuse. It shows a lack of baseline confidence in their ability to rebuild a program of our caliber without simply throwing money at the problem.
We need a coach who understands exactly what we have right now: a middle-of-the-road NIL support structure paired with top-tier basketball expectations. Coaches who are confident in their abilities to turn around a program like ours will likely see NIL support increase as wins come and momentum builds.
That is why I continue to come back to Hodgson, even though he may not be the most sought-after coach on the market. He appears extremely confident in his ability, understands the current limitations of the program, and still recognizes what Syracuse can become.
He also brings a modern approach to basketball. His teams play an extremely fast-paced offensive style that could turn the Dome into a place of entertaining, high-energy basketball again. In addition, he places a strong emphasis on analytics, which will be critical as we continue to operate within budget constraints while maintaining high expectations.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder:
I can't think of one alum I'd want, so if true, it's mutual.I’m not guessing either.
I have to think there is an element of ego and face saving on their parts, for not being the perceived top choice. A guy like Hop for example, who is uber- personable, and a natural born salesman / fund raiser, there is no way he wouldn't feel he could drum up financial support for a resurgent hoops program. And Gerry - he's doing a solid but unspectacular job in the freakin MAAC. When is the last time a coach jumped from that league to the big leagues? Let alone to a historically top tier program of which one is an alum. Doesn't happen. While I don't doubt Dash or Jake's intel, I suspect there is more to the story than the initial headline.I can't even think of an alum who would be a consideration besides G-Mac. Hop?
USF has a fanbase like LeMoyne. How you draw a couple hundred for a big rival is beyond me.They’re already bracing for losing him to Orange.
Once again SU is screwing itself over with a goofy timeline. If JW is gone he shouldn't be hiring the next hoops coach.John Wildhack has done a lot of sensational things here at Syracuse, but his legacy is riding on getting this next basketball hire right.
This and Jake’s post has convinced me to not purchase season tickets any longer.I couldn't agree with your post more. I know in my case, I'm not giving my opinions on this. This is what I have been told by people that are in a position to know.
While I get your point, the greater point is that coaches many think are “beneath us” may not be gettable.While there are concerns, this situation is ultimately beneficial for Syracuse because there is currently no alumnus who should be seriously considered for the job.
What we have at Syracuse is a sleeping giant that needs to be awakened before our NIL situation truly improves. That reality will understandably turn some coaches away, but that says more about them than it does about Syracuse. It shows a lack of baseline confidence in their ability to rebuild a program of our caliber without simply throwing money at the problem.
We need a coach who understands exactly what we have right now: a middle-of-the-road NIL support structure paired with top-tier basketball expectations. Coaches who are confident in their abilities to turn around a program like ours will likely see NIL support increase as wins come and momentum builds.
That is why I continue to come back to Hodgson, even though he may not be the most sought-after coach on the market. He appears extremely confident in his ability, understands the current limitations of the program, and still recognizes what Syracuse can become.
He also brings a modern approach to basketball. His teams play an extremely fast-paced offensive style that could turn the Dome into a place of entertaining, high-energy basketball again. In addition, he places a strong emphasis on analytics, which will be critical as we continue to operate within budget constraints while maintaining high expectations.
Chestnut Hill is gorgeous? My son is a student at BC Law and Chestnut Hill/Newton is overly expensive, full of construction, and nowhere to park. They have a Wegmans, but it’s so small and overpriced. Give me Dewitt, Fayetteville or Manlius any day
While I get your point, the greater point is that coaches many think are “beneath us” may not be gettable.
That’s not a great place to be generally. I do think we end up with Hodgson, though.
I’m actually okay with Gmac if there is donor support. Another alum I keep hearing is Jason Hart. By numerous folks. I don’t think BH is that great but I think he knows how to coach. Get fearful with him recruiting. But winning solves everything.Alums-plural. Yes.
What about his recruiting is fearful?I don’t think BH is that great but I think he knows how to coach. Get fearful with him recruiting.
Yeah, this.
I don't doubt the rumors; it'd be hard not to consider GMac. But it's kind of like when people say they're thinking about buying some classic car or sports car or whatever and ultimately end up buying the SUV or truck they were always going to.
When push comes to shove GMac is a risk, I just don't see people collectively willing to bet on it after the failed Autry experiment. Brains should and will winout over hearts here.