Coach Search Options after Autry | Page 148 | Syracusefan.com

Coach Search Options after Autry

Nothing you said makes Hop a proven loser.
I’m old, dumb, and slow. All the big brains like JW and Lally and others will figure this out. But if Hop is selected, which it sounds like he is a serious candidate based on the financial pipeline he brings, then it won’t be the end of the world. If anything, hiring the young mid major coach with 1 big donor sugar daddy seems like the riskier higher long term and vulnerable to changing winds and attitudes. But what do I know. Like I said, I’m old dumb and slow .
Please stop Mike.
 
Power struggles like this happen in corporate America all the time. I’ve witnessed a few and won a couple myself. It’s incredibly nerve-racking day to day until everything is official and comes out how you would like. This will be the same. Feels like the basketball alums final pitch to keep it within their own house.
 
Is there bad blood between Melo/Lally?
Yea not sure how they’ll carry on after this
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3214.jpeg
    IMG_3214.jpeg
    14.2 KB · Views: 10
Honestly, the rational part of me says whoever brings the biggest financial backing to the program should have heavy influence over the next HC. It’s a new world and the financial machine matters, maybe even more than coaching, assuming the coach has some level of ability to run a program (Red did not).

I wish we didn’t have rich alums divided over who should coach the team. United resources go a lot further than divided.

Does anyone have insight if Lally and Melo are aligned? I have a feeling they most likely are not.
I wonder if this was a factor in Wildhack retiring-i.e not wanting to deal w/ this?
 
Also, one more thing. Those trustees who know absolutely nothing about collegiate athletics get wiped shut during these trustee discussions. They talk big until it’s time to actually discuss.
Here is the list of trustees. A lot of big time names. Like others have said, the timing with Wildhack leaving could affect how the selection process for a new coach will transpire. Has a secret committee been set up that will be responsible or is it the same trustees who will be selecting the next Athletic Director.

It wouldn't surprise me that the trustees are fast tracking the AD selection, knowing that there is some other unfinished business to attend to.

 
Here is the list of trustees. A lot of big time names. Like others have said, the timing with Wildhack leaving could affect how the selection process for a new coach will transpire. Has a secret committee been set up that will be responsible or is it the same trustees who will be selecting the next Athletic Director.

It wouldn't surprise me that the trustees are fast tracking the AD selection, knowing that there is some other unfinished business to attend to.

someone posted that elsewhere but also posted the bot athletic committee.
 
After the Dan Mullen thread. I said I would never get excited and worked up about someone again until it gets announced. I wasted 5 days being on this forum looking for every detail I could gobble up.

Here I am again on every twist and turn checking this thread at every moment to see updates. I’m still extremely concerned about the timelines of chancellor, AD, Basketball hires. But honestly, nothing I say or do is going to change the outcome. I can only hope and pray SU does the right things.
 
Power struggles like this happen in corporate America all the time. I’ve witnessed a few and won a couple myself. It’s incredibly nerve-racking day to day until everything is official and comes out how you would like. This will be the same. Feels like the basketball alums final pitch to keep it within their own house.
I can relate. I have been in couple of power struggles lost some ,won some. It will be contentious, but the program will benefit.
 
8 years as an assistant under Oates > 22 years as an assistant under JB. Ya get it yet????
Successful head coaching job @ Arkansas State and USF + experience with NIL > Trash job @ Washington with all of his precious top recruits (who are still in the NBA) and no experience significantly navigating NIL
 
It's a bad idea because he was an abject failure the last 3 years of his tenure at the University of Washington.

I'm very happy that he landed on his feet in an assisting coaching capacity in the NBA, but let's be real. No other college team is angling to land Mike Hopkins right now. When he was at Washington, his schemes on both sides of the ball were subpar. We saw the same in terms of subpar systems on both sides of the ball with Red, here.

Who would win a sign up for that?

Hop shouldn't be in play at all. The only reason he is is that he has ties to the program. Scooch said it above, we shouldn't have to qualify candidates by saying,"...but he's a great guy..."

Given the precarious position our program is in, there shouldn't be any "buts" involved.

Board members and donors screwed up the last hire, I don't want to see them screw up this higher and get the program even further beached.

Boosters in school administrators ought to pay attention to the fan apathy, the massively declined attendance, and the disgruntled malaise that the program is mired in. If they want to risk it by not bringing in a proven commodity, then the financial hits and fan disengagement could continue to worsen.

I think things would be different if we were a program that was going to the NCAA tournament and winning 22 games a year, as a role of the dice. That's not the status quo, we are floundering and we need a coach who has proven chops to right the ship.
Agreed which begs the question, who would he bring in as assistants?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,642
Messages
5,272,354
Members
6,196
Latest member
NickMar

Online statistics

Members online
94
Guests online
5,989
Total visitors
6,083


P
Top Bottom