You're in charge of changing this.
Bees is in charge of the alumni ticket outreach program.
jec1521 said:Just more and more excuses. We make fun of Rutgers for rushing the field after beating a weak Michigan team, yet we can't even sell out (or even come close) for the #1 team in the country, and the DEFENDING NATIONAL CHAMPION. And don't give me the "the product on the field stinks" excuse. Big changes were just made. If anything, this is when the team needs the fanbase the most. Pathetic.
jec1521 said:Just more and more excuses. We make fun of Rutgers for rushing the field after beating a weak Michigan team, yet we can't even sell out (or even come close) for the #1 team in the country, and the DEFENDING NATIONAL CHAMPION. And don't give me the "the product on the field stinks" excuse. Big changes were just made. If anything, this is when the team needs the fanbase the most. Pathetic.
So it's pathetic that there are fewer fans when we play worse?? Funny, those fans logic just makes too much sense (and don't that's an SU thing… that's everywhere)Just more and more excuses. We make fun of Rutgers for rushing the field after beating a weak Michigan team, yet we can't even sell out (or even come close) for the #1 team in the country, and the DEFENDING NATIONAL CHAMPION.
And don't give me the "the product on the field stinks" excuse. Big changes were just made. If anything, this is when the team needs the fanbase the most.
Pathetic.
If they play good football, fans think it is a good thing.Somewhat knowledgeable football fans still see 4-1 as a good thing and 2-3 as bad even while knowing full well the schedules are completely different. If you have an average team and play above average teams the numbers will slide to having an under 500 record, it really isn't rocket science. Fans show up for 4-1 and stay home for 2-3 but hey...keep doing the same thing over and over again and expect different results, it really seems like it is working.
Playing these tough OOC schedules gets you beat up, lose more games, decrease depth and not be able to develop depth. As long as SU is in the same division as FSU, Clemson and Louisville, the best we can hope for is 7-5. It's not just the offense that shoots itself in the foot here.
If they play good football, fans think it is a good thing.
Maybe but playing well and losing to a good team is better than playing like crap and losing. It gives fans hope for future games. Note, I am not talking fair weather fans because they don't really care about the future.True but losing even when playing well will keep the numbers at 40K and below. The average fan really does not know what playing well is.
Yea, disappointing and has been for years. Says that SU is doing something wrong.
I don't know. Didn't say we did? Don't think anyone did.
that really tells us a lot.Defending national champs with a Heisman Trophy QB.
Beyond pathetic.
Anything less than 45,000 is an embarrassment.
We used to get crowds like this for UConn and Rutgers.
Not sure how you conclude "winning may not be the cure, cnyers just dont like football"that really tells us a lot.
winning may not be the cure, cnyers just dont like football.
when the royals were pathetically getting 10k for a saturday night game in july for years, theyd get 50k on a tueday in mid-may when the Yankees rolled in.
granted winston is not a tebow (nobody will ever be) but still...
They won (or dare I say or tied) every game that year including crushing PSU. I agree, the fair weathers didn't really care too much about SOS...but SU had a good and exciting team that year. And even in '87, there was a lag in attendance. '87 paid attendance dividends over the next 2-3 years. It takes a while for the fair weather fans to become affiliated because they want to wait until they know it is "safe".SWC posted an interesting stat regarding how poor the 87 SOS schedule was and look how that turned out. They really didn't beat anyone that good and an average PSU came into town when SU was undefeated and look how that went.