He’s talking about ACCELERATE. Isn‘t that our program?
Instead of telling us we don’t know stuff, could you tell us stuff so we would know? Please?
And it doesn’t really matter what we are or aren’t doing relative to the ACC. We are either going to get players good enough to compete in our full schedule, including NCAAs, or we aren’t. The players we are recruiting, by abe large, are entertaining offers from non-ACC schools. Would be great if the ACC Network was doing us similar favors, too. I would expect SU would have some role in making that happen, but as the article on that topic says, that is a unique deal. Point is, we need to be active, proactive, and aggressive, and those of us who aren’t super plugged-in to all of this aren’t seeing us in ‘winning‘ posture. I have done not more than one minute’s worth of research on the agency/company we were just reported to be working with, and as I just wrote, they give me zero confidence. Based in Alabama? Which might explain why they think “Influcer” is a good name for the company.
I’ve also asked a few times about our own David Falk School of Sports Management, and what it might be doing toward developing programs that might help us. No answers. I know the school can’t itself make offers to athletes—I’m talking about indirect or affiliation or consultancy-type situations, or even just coursework for athletes to help them better navigate and exploit the new landscape. We should be leading in those aspects. Are we?