CUSE/PITT Counter Balance

[TexanMark]

Just a theory but we seem to swing in 15 year cycles or so with Pitt.

If Pitt is good, Cuse is bad
If Cuse is Good, Pitt is bad

Don't want to jinx it, but I kinda like seeing Sh!tty Pitt

 

[Eric15]

Just a theory and we seem to swing in 15 year cycles or so.

If Pitt is good, Cuse is bad
If Cuse is Good, Pitt is bad

Don't want to jinx it, but I kinda like seeing Sh!tty Pitt

We've only played three games in our long history where we both were ranked.

1956: #10 Pitt beat #7 SU 14-7
1989: #13 Pitt beat #10 SU 30-23
1991: #24 SU beat #20 Pitt 31-27

 

[OrangeTarheel]

Whooping up on Pitt should be the new norm

 

[bigmike]

Just a theory and we seem to swing in 15 year cycles or so.

If Pitt is good, Cuse is bad
If Cuse is Good, Pitt is bad

Don't want to jinx it, but I kinda like seeing Sh!tty Pitt

Agree, and PITT players confirming with their feet by hitting the portal. Nard-dog may be on the ropes.

 

[NJneer12]

We've only played three games in our long history where we both were ranked.

1956: #10 Pitt beat #7 SU 14-7
1989: #13 Pitt beat #10 SU 30-23
1991: #24 SU beat #20 Pitt 31-27

That's. Insane.

 

[syrBossHogg]

Makes sense, two peer schools located in the same region with not enough talent to support both. Something's gotta give...