We played defense?
billsin01 said:I like the post but I'm not sure I agree. A couple points that I think make this a different discussion: 1) we're discussing, at least in large part in this thread, MLS displacing MLB, nBA and NHL. The original poster even suggested the nfl should be on alert. Even if you throw the nfl out, we're not simply discussing a viable, popular, profitable league -- we're discussing the second most popular sport in the US. That would have to be a pretty high quality league. 2) college sports are obviously not as 'good', I agree. But hoops and football are made up almost exclusively of American 'kids' and have their own histories. Most people are fans b/c they feel a part of a university either by proximity or b/c they went to school there. And the universities themselves are uniquely American. To me those make college sports a different discussion.
Our midfield was completely overrun and out defenders kept us in the game against some of the best attacking teams in the world. Matt Besler, Deandre Yedlin, and Fabian Johnson. There's a reason there are huge transfer rumors around those names after the Cup.
Understood on #1, and I've said repeatedly in this thread that the notion of MLS ascending to big 5 status in the US anytime soon(ish) is not supported by any data.
And on #2, yes, college sports have a litany of unique factors that boost it's popularity. Many of which are factors not at play for soccer. Just making the point that's it's not ALL about a league being at the pinnacle of its competitive set. I'd argue that given MLS is not yet a premiere league makes it's performance all the more impressive. The quality of play should only improve over time.
The World Cup is much more popular than in 2010 in the USA. No question about it. However it is the influx in the population of Hispanics that is driving the ratings up. Not the White Males, not the White Females, not the Black males and not the Black females. Univision is kicking the crap out of ESPN head to head.
That's cute Matt how you try to twist it but I think the media and others are trying to make a big deal out of nothing. You can't argue that Hispanics aren't driving the increase because the facts show they are. Bottom line is that in a week soccer will be nothing more than a blip on the radar for white and black america. If you want to argue that show me facts to back it up.I know you provided your links, and I'm sure there's some truth in it, but the fact of the matter is that World Cup ratings are about 50% higher than in 2010 and there's simply no way that the Hispanic population in the US is 50% more than it was four years ago. Sorry, but you're making a gross over-simplification here.
i'm saying football gets action because people like football more
fantasy football is like family guy. i hate it and people try way hard to convince me that i really would like it if i gave it a chance.
i like watching teams that exist. i don't understand watching teams that exist to derive some weird score for a team that doesn't exist
fantasy football is like family guy. i hate it and people try way hard to convince me that i really would like it if i gave it a chance.
i like watching teams that exist. i don't understand watching teams that exist to derive some weird score for a team that doesn't exist
Hey, the Tour De France has begun and cycling is getting huge. Let's all get our yellow jerseys on!
cliftonparksufan said:That's cute Matt how you try to twist it but I think the media and others are trying to make a big deal out of nothing. You can't argue that Hispanics aren't driving the increase because the facts show they are. Bottom line is that in a week soccer will be nothing more than a blip on the radar for white and black america. If you want to argue that show me facts to back it up.
You have to realize that Germany had 6 players who play for Bayern Munich, arguably the best club in the world, who, I'd imagine, play together ~10 months out of the year. That cohesion is so incredibly important on the international stage. That's why you see guys like Messi and Ronaldo suffering a bit during the World Cup.Interesting post. I can honestly say I never would have guessed it was that close particularly based (albeit with an untrained eye) on watching Germany and Belgium destroy us. It'll be interesting to see what happens. And no I certainly didn't intend AA as a compliment -- I literally just felt it was a fair representation in terms of being a talented league with talented players and teams but nowhere near the level of the mlb teams.
I know you provided your links, and I'm sure there's some truth in it, but the fact of the matter is that World Cup ratings are about 50% higher than in 2010 and there's simply no way that the Hispanic population in the US is 50% more than it was four years ago. Sorry, but you're making a gross over-simplification here.
time zone is huge.The timezone thing greatly plays in the favor of 2014 v 2010 and South Africa.
Fine, once again ill be that guy...
Get out your arrows you liberal PC freaks...
All that # means about Univision is too many people in the United States of America don't speak or understand the Fn language that the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution or the the Bill of Rights was written in.
Score one for the owners and Capitalism, but damn...
im sure theres tons of other reasons too. maybe they have the pat summerall and john madden of futbol calling it.I think you're reading a bit too much into the univision thing. While many watching Univision may in fact be Spanish it is also the only live telecast that one can access online without needing cable provider login info AKA I'm not Spanish but I've watched some of the cup on Univision and don't imagine I'm alone in that.
cliftonparksufan said:That's cute Matt how you try to twist it but I think the media and others are trying to make a big deal out of nothing. You can't argue that Hispanics aren't driving the increase because the facts show they are. Bottom line is that in a week soccer will be nothing more than a blip on the radar for white and black america. If you want to argue that show me facts to back it up.
Mistakebythelake90 said:Preface: The only time I've ever watched soccer was the USMNT. I think that one of the biggest factors regarding soccers growth now and in the future that hasn't been mentioned much in this thread is media accessibility. If you look back even 10 years ago, I imagine it would have been very difficult to watch international soccer. If you go back farther in time to the 70's or 80's, it would have been near impossible. Even if your kids are playing soccer, if you can't watch it professionally, it is hard to build a lasting fan base. People often (rightfully) credit the rise of the Big East to the TV deals/coverage it got. Soccer never had anything even close to that. Nowadays with advanced internet and even some mainstream coverage, the average sports fan can actually watch quality soccer. In years past, after the excitement of the world cup wore off, if people were still interested in soccer, they had few options to turn to. It is easy to stir up interest when you are running games on espn/abc. Now though when they get interested, they actually can follow up, and watch more games. We do have this conversation every four years, but I think that the growth of sports media and technology seperates the discussion from the last few times. The first way to get people interested is to get it on TV, and that is finally happening. Having said all that, I think that soccer is still 1-2 generations away from truly catching on. I would say, anecdotally, that the average sports fan in my age group (23) is casually interested in not just the USMNT, but soccer abroad. We have both the access and interest to build a following. Once my generation starts growing older and having families who are also interested in soccer beyond just youth soccer, then we might start to build a culture that supports soccer just as much as the NBA/MLB. As a side note, I would rather watch soccer over baseball any day of the week, and twice on fridays.
im sure theres tons of other reasons too. maybe they have the pat summerall and john madden of futbol calling it.
in NYC, you can watch univision with an antenna.
maybe scooch could answer why, but it seems that people like to watch sports off an antenna as opposed to cable.
im just making up #s here, but why do i think that if bama-lsu is on espn it will do a 4, but if its on abc it will do an 8?? plus, cable ratings always come with caveat...'highest on cable' or whatever.
is there that many people in america without cable??
in the big citys i guess i get it, you can get like 15 channels in NYC that way.
out of my league...
I feel like the soccer haters in this thread are ignoring so many facts that have been laid out in great detail in this thread. the haters simply re-state the orthodoxy that is no longer relevant.