ACC Coach of the Year voting:
Dabo Swinney, Clemson - 27
Dino Babers, Syracuse - 22
Pat Narduzzi, Pitt - 9
Steve Addazio, Boston College - 1
Bronco Mendenhall, Virginia - 1
That is some shameful shizz.
ACC Coach of the Year voting:
Dabo Swinney, Clemson - 27
Dino Babers, Syracuse - 22
Pat Narduzzi, Pitt - 9
Steve Addazio, Boston College - 1
Bronco Mendenhall, Virginia - 1
We'll have a chance to test this scenario next year, when we are undefeated.I get it. Clemson was undefeated. Syracuse wasn't. Dino did more with less, without a doubt. But Dabo didn't lose a game. It's fine.
Dino came in second place. I'm cool with this
Then why did Narduzzi get 9 votes, and Addazio 1. And Mendenhall 1. Those are the voters you should be questioning.Total BS! The ACC homers don’t like the northeast teams and it is quite obvious here.
I get it. Clemson was undefeated. Syracuse wasn't. Dino did more with less, without a doubt. But Dabo didn't lose a game. It's fine.
Dino came in second place. I'm cool with this
How do you fix this then for future COY voting?Then why did Narduzzi get 9 votes, and Addazio 1. And Mendenhall 1. Those are the voters you should be questioning.
Dino voted for Dabo.1. It's not revealed who voted for who, right?
I couldn't find anything on the interweb.
Just curious how the 14 head head coaches voted versus how the 46 media members voted.
2. Those 46 media members are the same people who voted SU to finish last. Expecting them to consider SU is worthy of 1st place votes is probably asking too much of them.
He has a better chance for that than this.Guess he’s going to get National Coach of the year then
He has a better chance for that than this.
Dabo is a very good coach. He did what he was supposed to do with the players and resources he had to work with. Clemson was projected by the experts to go 12-0 and they did it. Props to him; it is not easy to go undefeated; even in a weak year for ACC football.
But Babers and his staff outcoached Dabo in his own stadium. All Dabo did to get the win is take advantage of a worn down Syracuse defense by running the ball.
Syracuse might have 1 or 2 players that could start at Clemson.
Syracuse had no first team all conference players on offense and one, a true frosh, on defense.
Syracuse was picked to finish last in their division. I saw a bunch of power listings where Syracuse was listed last in the entire conference. Most experts had Syracuse finishing 4-8.
I ask you, who did the better job coaching up their players?
He has a better chance for that than this.
Dabo is a very good coach. He did what he was supposed to do with the players and resources he had to work with. Clemson was projected by the experts to go 12-0 and they did it. Props to him; it is not easy to go undefeated; even in a weak year for ACC football.
But Babers and his staff outcoached Dabo in his own stadium. All Dabo did to get the win is take advantage of a worn down Syracuse defense by running the ball.
Syracuse might have 1 or 2 players that could start at Clemson.
Syracuse had no first team all conference players on offense and one, a true frosh, on defense.
Syracuse was picked to finish last in their division. I saw a bunch of power listings where Syracuse was listed last in the entire conference. Most experts had Syracuse finishing 4-8.
I ask you, who did the better job coaching up their players?