VirginiaOrange
2nd String
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2011
- Messages
- 961
- Like
- 739
I get the view that SU should be looking both inside and outside for a potential HC. What I don't get are the posts that totally dismiss Shafer as being a bad choice - mainly because these posts offer no factual evidence to support why it is a bad move.
I assume that 90%+ of the posters out here have had zero interaction with Shafer. I am willing to bet that same percentage has little insight into inside opinions of Shafer's personality and abilities.
To those who have deeper contacts within the program - what are the thoughts on Shafer during his time at SU? Well liked? Respected? Not impressed?
And if you do not like the pick - what are the reasons Shafer is not the right guy? Again, I get the SU should take the time and talk to x, y and z. What I want to understand is why those who have true insight into Shafer and his time on the Hill think x, y and z are better/worse choices.
I assume that 90%+ of the posters out here have had zero interaction with Shafer. I am willing to bet that same percentage has little insight into inside opinions of Shafer's personality and abilities.
To those who have deeper contacts within the program - what are the thoughts on Shafer during his time at SU? Well liked? Respected? Not impressed?
And if you do not like the pick - what are the reasons Shafer is not the right guy? Again, I get the SU should take the time and talk to x, y and z. What I want to understand is why those who have true insight into Shafer and his time on the Hill think x, y and z are better/worse choices.