Dominent Player Situation..... | Syracusefan.com

Dominent Player Situation.....

newmexicuse

All Conference
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
3,661
Like
8,105
Gotta love this team so far in general.

However, to get to the FF & perhaps win a championship, I still think we will need the dominent go to type of guy who can deliver consistantly with the game on the line.

So far it has been by committee with Scoop, Brandon, Kris, and Dion taking turns. James has also shown he can do it should we happen to run into a D2 level team in the FF.

Melo has proven that he can take over for stretches, but he wll need at least one more season (should he stay) to really be a dominator. Part of the issue with Melo is his teammates not consistantly getting him the ball as they did for Rick last season, so it is obvious the guys he plays with do not see him in that role at this point in time.

CJ just makes critical playes on both ends be it to get a key bucket, a key board, a key steal, etc., but at this stage of his development he isn't a player you can just give the ball to & let him create or score.

So getting back to the Big 4 they are all very good players, but truthfully, none of them are really elite players ala Sullinger or Lamb. last year with Walker we witnesses how far one dominent player can take a team with a little bit of help.

Scoop has the best mindset in terms of wanting to be that player, but as we all know the elite skills and athleticism are simply lacking and he can do it sometimes, but not all of the time.

KJo can get hot from three & he can take it to the hole on the drive if he gets the mis-match. He excels in transition. He really need to be able to post up at about 10' out & be able to create/score consistantly from there to put himself into the go to dominent role. I don't see any reason why he can't do that skillwise, but on the court that does not seem to be a part of his game. Probably too late in his career as a collegiate to add that dimension to his game.

That leaves Dion and Brandon, both are very strong guards. Dion is better at creating his shot, Brandon is better as a pure shooter when given time. Both can go the hole with power. Dion, I think, very badly wants that role. Brandon has been more content to take what is given to him, though I really liked his play and aggressiveness last night. Could the light switch have turned on for him ?

So all in all, I have no conclusion about any of the four really stepping up to be that man at this point in time. So far the committee approach has worked, but come Dance time, we will need somebody who we can really count on to step up and dominate consistantly if we are to go very deep IMHO.
 
Gotta love this team so far in general.

However, to get to the FF & perhaps win a championship, I still think we will need the dominent go to type of guy who can deliver consistantly with the game on the line.

So far it has been by committee with Scoop, Brandon, Kris, and Dion taking turns. James has also shown he can do it should we happen to run into a D2 level team in the FF.

Kris is the guy. He was the go to guy in the 2nd halves of the last 3 BCS games. But, because he struggled, JB went to Triche and Waiters as next in line. Those 2 are the next best pure scorers.

Hot hand will be the go to type guy. KJ, BT and DW will always have plays run for them early on to see which of them will have the play run for them late.
 
Kris is the guy. He was the go to guy in the 2nd halves of the last 3 BCS games. But, because he struggled, JB went to Triche and Waiters as next in line. Those 2 are the next best pure scorers.

Hot hand will be the go to type guy. KJ, BT and DW will always have plays run for them early on to see which of them will have the play run for them late.

Only if Kris dosn't dribble too much.
 
There's more than one way to skin a cat newmexicuse.

One formula [the one that worked for us in 2003] is the one you describe. The Duke team that won in 2010 wasn't anything like the team you describe. Good teams that can defend, rebound, and have complimentary offensive balance can also be contenders.

Not saying that you're wrong, just that there is more than one way to build a team.
 
The guys you list, Sullinger, Lamb, Walker or a Melo aren't on the roster. We will have to be dominant with balance.
 
There's more than one way to skin a cat newmexicuse.

One formula [the one that worked for us in 2003] is the one you describe. The Duke team that won in 2010 wasn't anything like the team you describe. Good teams that can defend, rebound, and have complimentary offensive balance can also be contenders.

Not saying that you're wrong, just that there is more than one way to build a team.

Jb actually referenced last year's Duke team when asked about concerns that SU didn't have a go-to guy.
 
There's more than one way to skin a cat newmexicuse.

One formula [the one that worked for us in 2003] is the one you describe. The Duke team that won in 2010 wasn't anything like the team you describe. Good teams that can defend, rebound, and have complimentary offensive balance can also be contenders.

Not saying that you're wrong, just that there is more than one way to build a team.

Yes, of course, we have to build the team with the pieces that we have. And as Bees says it is possible to dominate with balance. However, I think that only takes us so far.

IMHO, we will need one of our big four to really step it up and get hot at the right time if we are to go all the way.
 
There's more than one way to skin a cat newmexicuse.

One formula [the one that worked for us in 2003] is the one you describe. The Duke team that won in 2010 wasn't anything like the team you describe. Good teams that can defend, rebound, and have complimentary offensive balance can also be contenders.

Not saying that you're wrong, just that there is more than one way to build a team.

Good post; that's exactly the phrase I was going to use.

Maybe it'd be nice to have a go-to guy, but we don't. If he materializes in the next 30-odd games, that's cool. If not, I think we've got the talent (and defensive focus) to win without him.
 
We know what we have -- balance & depth. Can't have everything.

We need our guys to work 2 man plays or find the open man. Just unrealistic to expect Triche to change his stripes, or KJ, or Fab. But we can have 3 guys in double figures most nights.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,645
Messages
4,902,822
Members
6,005
Latest member
CuseCanuck

Online statistics

Members online
37
Guests online
1,112
Total visitors
1,149


...
Top Bottom