Yep - 13 games, I think. An absolutely indefensible move by the NCAA. Given the end result for the team, though, no complaints on my end.
I'm familiar with the support for this idea, but I was pretty excited to see what Ennis can do on his own. And I'm more worried than I should be about messing around with team chemistry (this is unfounded, of course).
[/quote]
Not having a backup makes me nervous -- we got away with it last year, but we had two very talented/experienced backcourt guys.
Next year, it's a freshman and a couple of rs sophs. MG has upside but is unproven. TC has ability but some maturity issues.
Fortunately, Tyler seems incredibly poised. I came away from the Jordan game very impressed. You might have seen the game (and gotten a different impression). But I was surprised that, in such a chaotic me-first atmosphere, Tyler calmed things down and got people the ball in the right spots. He never seemed to force things, including his own shot. He hit guys in transition, unsettled offensive situations (just about every possession) and then, when there was a gap, boom he he went to the rim. And a couple nice steals on D.
On the dark side, when he arrived at the rim, he didn't have the strength or pure athleticism to throw down ala Brandon, MCW, Dion, Flynn, etc... But he did use his head ... and was very wily and crafty around the basket like Eidelin (although not as strong). Tyler may not wow you with hops, but he finds a way to score the ball.
We have all summer to spin this around. But as of now, I don't know if MG can backup the point/bring the ball up the court. If he can (he did it in practice against MCW), I'll be a little less concerned than having TC try to play the point.
If MG does not have the handle to bring up the ball against pressure, then maybe a backup like Barton would be a nice insurance policy. The answer may be apparent from JB's interest level.