OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 244,839
- Like
- 453,862
AW also is like the divorced parent that leaves the community, but still interacts and maintain relationships with people very involved in the community which also just adds another interesting wrinkle in all of this.Timing is interesting to see former basketball players feeling comfortable to speak on this publicly to try and get answers on why Weitsman isn’t involved anymore. Why the timing is fascinating, is the football part of the complex is now complete. Fundraising continues, but certainly much better for Syracuse and us fans, if we can keep the Lally’s continued support and get AW back on board. People will keep going back to the AW situation because the outsider view is that AW was shunned for reasons no one can explain publicly.
Timing is interesting to see former basketball players feeling comfortable to speak on this publicly to try and get answers on why Weitsman isn’t involved anymore. Why the timing is fascinating, is the football part of the complex is now complete. Fundraising continues for many initiatives I’m sure, but certainly much better for Syracuse and us fans, if we can keep the Lally’s continued support and get AW back on board. People will keep going back to the AW situation because the outsider view is that AW was shunned for reasons no one can explain publicly.
I don't think these guys understand that, on replay, their ad break comments are recorded and part of the replay, LOL!
Sometimes things are better left unsaid.
With that being said, there are legitimate reasons why the University removed itself from AW and if they publicly stated it, all would feel the same and agree with the university.
That is a good strategy if you want people to continue to ask questions that won't get answered.
So what do the tea leaves say?
If the answer was said out loud, there would be slander or libel litigation??
I didn’t see it like that at all. It appears to me like Devo and Etan were talking NIL and how to up the funds. Obviously this is going to bring donors that could possibly donate. Which then poses the question what happened to AW. Then the other donor poked into chat section drawing that donor name to the conversation. It didn’t appear one side wants it more to me.No, I just dont think the university cares. They made a decision based on certain things and they are a private university and are entitled to not disclosing this information.
There is a reason why the university remains mum on it and AW and his friends continue to try to get the university to take him back...
Obviously, one side wants the other side more.
I think that has to be it. My experience, which I will share soon is almost unexplainable. I know there will be a news story about it.That is a good strategy if you want people to continue to ask questions that won't get answered.
So what do the tea leaves say?
If the answer was said out loud, there would be slander or libel litigation??
No, I just dont think the university cares. They made a decision based on certain things and they are a private university and are entitled to not disclosing this information.
There is a reason why the university remains mum on it and AW and his friends continue to try to get the university to take him back...
Obviously, one side wants the other side more.
Questions will be asked when your AD comes out and says the NIL is short and you've turned away a big fish donor who's seemingly at odds with other big fish donors.
Rich donors refusing to play in the same sandbox together is not a good look anyway you try and square it.
Then people have the right to not support them if they choose to.No, I just dont think the university cares. They made a decision based on certain things and they are a private university and are entitled to not disclosing this information.
There is a reason why the university remains mum on it and AW and his friends continue to try to get the university to take him back...
Obviously, one side wants the other side more.
Eric is great calling games and dissecting on-court play. Off the court, he's largely uninformed and purely speculating most of his takes.Gotta be honest - I could care less what either of these two guys think about anything.
I think yours is a very fair comment.Eric is great calling games and dissecting on-court play. Off the court, he's largely uninformed and purely speculating most of his takes.
Syracuse is not keeping him away because he does not play nice with other donors. If that was the case there are others that they would have turned off by now.
I think yours is a very fair comment.
Yes but I don't know the story. I only know how I was treated when I tried to mediate this thing.I didn't say he was the donor not playing nice. If anything, he's been trying to play extra nice to get his foot back in the door...
Agreed on Devo not really knowing heads from tails on a lot. Also, Etan doesn't even know the Lally name?!
I do think the Weitsman topic is a legit topic, however.
Too much smoke and mirrors and boardroom intrigue at this point for there not to be a story there (and as you have also alluded to.)
When one side of the story is not being told I always assume Hookers or Drugs. It's like going to Vegas and something doesn't add up when someone is telling the story about what they got up to out there.Yes but I don't know the story. I only know how I was treated when I tried to mediate this thing.
Yes but I don't know the story. I only know how I was treated when I tried to mediate this thing.
Because I know there will be.Sounds like you have your own story.
Why do you think there will be a news story?
Assuming it's the P-S. Carlson does a nice job digging deep and investigating gray areas like this. I look forward to reading it. Really anything investigative by the staff is usually pretty interesting and illuminating.Because I know there will be.