We not getting a 1 seed.
oh yea, and who is going to get it? give me 4 more deserving teams.
LOL, UVa for one.oh yea, and who is going to get it? give me 4 more deserving teams.
Uva has no shot of getting oneLOL, UVa for one.
UF, UA, WSU, UVa, KU, and probably the winner of the Big 10 have better shots at 1 seeds than us right now. Unfortunate reality of the situation.
I think we have to win out to be assured of a 1 seed. Make the ACC finals and we are likely a 1 seed. Lose to FSU and before the ACC finals and we are definitely not a 1 seed.We only have three losses. win the next two, and get at least one win in the acct and we are in good shape
It's very disheartening. We've already had 2 championship level teams derailed at the start of the tourney. If Grant doesn't come back healthy, that will be 3 times in 5 years we've been screwed by missing players. And we've already lost DC this year so that's already a blow. Only reason I can post right now is cuz my gf is here. If she wasn't, this laptop would have already been shatteredThe basketball gods won't let us be at full strength in March.
What. So sick of this.
LOL, UVa for one.
UF, UA, WSU, UVa, KU, and probably the winner of the Big 10 have better shots at 1 seeds than us right now. Unfortunate reality of the situation.
Uva has no shot of getting one
No they don't.I think they absolutely have a shot of getting the 4th 1 seed if they win out and get a little bit of help (e.g. Kansas/SU, etc. lose another game).
This reminds me of a particular quote in this board from a few years ago:
"We're making the tournament. You are a bunch of Nancy's."
From a generally respected poster on this board.
44cuse
UF, UA and WSU are the only 3 you could seriously make an arguement for.
The committee has said about 90000000 times that they take the whole body of work, not how teams play at the end. Virginias whole body of work is significantly worse than ours. Kansas has 6 loses, we have 3.
yeah completely incomprehensibleI literally have no idea what you are trying to say...
Name 4 teams better than UVa since January 1st? The "whole body of work" comes into play, but also how a team has played during the end of their season. UVa struggled in December but they've been one of the best teams in the country since New Year's. They just waxed us by 19. What more do you want out of them to prove that they are a good team???UF, UA and WSU are the only 3 you could seriously make an arguement for.
The committee has said about 90000000 times that they take the whole body of work, not how teams play at the end. Virginias whole body of work is significantly worse than ours. Kansas has 6 loses, we have 3.
Name 4 teams better than UVa since January 1st? The "whole body of work" comes into play, but also how a team has played during the end of their season. UVa struggled in December but they've been one of the best teams in the country since New Year's. They just waxed us by 19. What more do you want out of them to prove that they are a good team???
No way we get a #1 seed. We will get a two and if grant doesn't come back big risk of losing. We are not the same without him.SU's hold on a #1 seed is exceptionally shaky right now. They absolutely can't futz around with GT or FSU.
I think they absolutely have a shot of getting the 4th 1 seed if they win out and get a little bit of help (e.g. Kansas/SU, etc. lose another game).
Sometimes it just comes down to how good a team is on the court, not just on paper, especially if that paper goes back to 2013. I don't see 4 teams better than UVa right now. We certainly are not.Their body of work in the non conference schedule is awful, plus they didn't play any of the top acc teams twice.