There's a difference between believing that GMac is "the guy" and the new coach having to be from the family. I have always believed GMac is "the guy" but it he wasn't hired I was not in the camp that whoever is hired has to be from the family. It is unfair to equate the two.Luck is where preparation meets opportunity. UConn was prepared and saw success when opportunity presented itself. Syracuse has been consistently unprepared for a decade. Even if there was an opportunity, there was no way to take advantage of it. And even if GMac is an “opportunity” - we’re not going to take advantage of it if “more competitive than the 2026 trainwreck” is the bar decision-makers have set.
I think some of the low bar setting is because of how adamant some here were that GMac was “the guy”. Now that the folks that are convinced we should never, ever consider a coach that didn’t play at Syracuse carried the day - the focus has shifted to setting the bar for “success” in year one as low as possible. It’s just a continuation of the loser mentality within the fanbase and administration that has infected Syracuse for years. Losers talk about how winners got lucky while setting their own bar for success as low as possible.
If we don’t make the NCAA tournament in year one, hiring GMac is well on the way to being a massive failure. Period, end of story.
There's a difference between believing that GMac is "the guy" and the new coach having to be from the family. I have always believed GMac is "the guy" but it he wasn't hired I was not in the camp that whoever is hired has to be from the family. It is unfair to equate the two.
Lobdell will definitely be on the roster.We do not know a single player who will be on the roster when the fall semester begins. I am hoping GMac can keep certain players and hit the portal hard since we have no Freshman recruits coming in.
It was unfair for some of the pro-GMac crowd to claim the ONLY reason people didn’t want him was because they wanted an outsider hired. But there were at least three or four clowns pushing that narrative here. I’m fine with pushing the counter-narrative and saying the only reason you wanted GMac was you insisted on a family hire. I don’t really care if that bothers you.
I’m more annoyed that some members of the GMac only crew are now setting the bar at anything less than the NCAA tournament. “Competitive” or “Bubble at minimum” qualify as a low standard. I don’t remotely care about any excuses - if GMac doesn’t make the tourney, the season is a failure. The idea that GMac absolutely had to be the guy if NIT or .500 is “success” is mind boggling to me - and it shows the real issue was that my narrative was -for some here - absolutely correct. They’d rather lose with GMac coaching than win with an outsider hired hire. It’s pathetic.
To be clear -- I didn't want only GMac because he was family. I wanted GMac because I think he was the best person out there. My point is I think it is incorrect to say that people who wanted GMac did so only because he was family.It was unfair for some of the pro-GMac crowd to claim the ONLY reason people didn’t want him was because they wanted an outsider hired. But there were at least three or four clowns pushing that narrative here. I’m fine with pushing the counter-narrative and saying the only reason you wanted GMac was you insisted on a family hire. I don’t really care if that bothers you.
I’m more annoyed that some members of the GMac only crew are now setting the bar at anything less than the NCAA tournament. “Competitive” or “Bubble at minimum” qualify as a low standard. I don’t remotely care about any excuses - if GMac doesn’t make the tourney, the season is a failure. The idea that GMac absolutely had to be the guy if NIT or .500 is “success” is mind boggling to me - and it shows the real issue was that my narrative was -for some here - absolutely correct. They’d rather lose with GMac coaching than win with an outsider hired hire. It’s pathetic.