Expectations in Year 1 | Page 6 | Syracusefan.com

Expectations in Year 1

Luck is where preparation meets opportunity. UConn was prepared and saw success when opportunity presented itself. Syracuse has been consistently unprepared for a decade. Even if there was an opportunity, there was no way to take advantage of it. And even if GMac is an “opportunity” - we’re not going to take advantage of it if “more competitive than the 2026 trainwreck” is the bar decision-makers have set.

I think some of the low bar setting is because of how adamant some here were that GMac was “the guy”. Now that the folks that are convinced we should never, ever consider a coach that didn’t play at Syracuse carried the day - the focus has shifted to setting the bar for “success” in year one as low as possible. It’s just a continuation of the loser mentality within the fanbase and administration that has infected Syracuse for years. Losers talk about how winners got lucky while setting their own bar for success as low as possible.

If we don’t make the NCAA tournament in year one, hiring GMac is well on the way to being a massive failure. Period, end of story.
There's a difference between believing that GMac is "the guy" and the new coach having to be from the family. I have always believed GMac is "the guy" but it he wasn't hired I was not in the camp that whoever is hired has to be from the family. It is unfair to equate the two.
 
Expectations on year 1? We talked about that!!!

Energy level ratcheted to 7! Urinal breaking energy,!

Minimum games on the Clock Wise channel!

But seriously, I want to see:

Top 4 seeds in the ACC tournament.

Solidly in the NCAA tournament with an at large bid, no bubbles no first four.

Playing meaningful games in January.

Makes progress as a team as the season progresses, no regression and quitting.
 
We do not know a single player who will be on the roster when the fall semester begins. I am hoping GMac can keep certain players and hit the portal hard since we have no Freshman recruits coming in.
 
There's a difference between believing that GMac is "the guy" and the new coach having to be from the family. I have always believed GMac is "the guy" but it he wasn't hired I was not in the camp that whoever is hired has to be from the family. It is unfair to equate the two.


It was unfair for some of the pro-GMac crowd to claim the ONLY reason people didn’t want him was because they wanted an outsider hired. But there were at least three or four clowns pushing that narrative here. I’m fine with pushing the counter-narrative and saying the only reason you wanted GMac was you insisted on a family hire. I don’t really care if that bothers you.

I’m more annoyed that some members of the GMac only crew are now setting the bar at anything less than the NCAA tournament. “Competitive” or “Bubble at minimum” qualify as a low standard. I don’t remotely care about any excuses - if GMac doesn’t make the tourney, the season is a failure. The idea that GMac absolutely had to be the guy if NIT or .500 is “success” is mind boggling to me - and it shows the real issue was that my narrative was -for some here - absolutely correct. They’d rather lose with GMac coaching than win with an outsider hired hire. It’s pathetic.
 
It was unfair for some of the pro-GMac crowd to claim the ONLY reason people didn’t want him was because they wanted an outsider hired. But there were at least three or four clowns pushing that narrative here. I’m fine with pushing the counter-narrative and saying the only reason you wanted GMac was you insisted on a family hire. I don’t really care if that bothers you.

I’m more annoyed that some members of the GMac only crew are now setting the bar at anything less than the NCAA tournament. “Competitive” or “Bubble at minimum” qualify as a low standard. I don’t remotely care about any excuses - if GMac doesn’t make the tourney, the season is a failure. The idea that GMac absolutely had to be the guy if NIT or .500 is “success” is mind boggling to me - and it shows the real issue was that my narrative was -for some here - absolutely correct. They’d rather lose with GMac coaching than win with an outsider hired hire. It’s pathetic.

Take that handful of people that have upset you so much and ignore them. It’s far easier to ignore than let a small group get under your skin. Unless this is a passive aggressive way to be angry at anyone who expresses some optimism at the hire and looking at those with zero tolerance I don’t get bothering yourself so emphatically with the unique opinion of a few.
 
It was unfair for some of the pro-GMac crowd to claim the ONLY reason people didn’t want him was because they wanted an outsider hired. But there were at least three or four clowns pushing that narrative here. I’m fine with pushing the counter-narrative and saying the only reason you wanted GMac was you insisted on a family hire. I don’t really care if that bothers you.

I’m more annoyed that some members of the GMac only crew are now setting the bar at anything less than the NCAA tournament. “Competitive” or “Bubble at minimum” qualify as a low standard. I don’t remotely care about any excuses - if GMac doesn’t make the tourney, the season is a failure. The idea that GMac absolutely had to be the guy if NIT or .500 is “success” is mind boggling to me - and it shows the real issue was that my narrative was -for some here - absolutely correct. They’d rather lose with GMac coaching than win with an outsider hired hire. It’s pathetic.
To be clear -- I didn't want only GMac because he was family. I wanted GMac because I think he was the best person out there. My point is I think it is incorrect to say that people who wanted GMac did so only because he was family.
 
There were 2100 people at the ceremony today. The support is there. If he does any sort of winning in year 1, look out year 2. Hoping this works bc you can see what it means to him
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,066
Messages
5,324,857
Members
6,223
Latest member
camdencentr

Online statistics

Members online
343
Guests online
3,678
Total visitors
4,021


Top Bottom