This is impressive.
Simple. We have an unproven fisherman casting nets... with a soon-to-be unproven captain.
Straight from the horses mouth
"The danger of being involved in a lot of top 20 players is you can lose all of them. You could get a couple or you could lose them all," he said. "In the past, we always got good players. They weren't necessarily in that (top recruit) area. And we always could get a couple, two, three.
"But when you go only after the top guys, you can have some misses and not get anybody. So you always have to be a little careful of that."
I completely agree with this . The only problem is that the key and expected domino for this class hasn't fallen yet, and there is a real shot for it not to fall . I'm sure things will work out because they always seem to, but people have reason to be nervous, hell im sure the staff is.We talked about this about a year ago - the 17 class represents quite a shift in recruiting for Syracuse in going after basically all Top 50 and even Top 20 type guys. We haven't normally done that. It is a high risk, high reward. Absolutely, we could wind up with none of these targets. It absolutely doesn't mean GMac is at fault though. It is just plain tough to get guys like these. I suspect we will be happy at the end of the process. Syracuse has too much to offer to get completely frozen out.
We talked about this about a year ago - the 17 class represents quite a shift in recruiting for Syracuse in going after basically all Top 50 and even Top 20 type guys. We haven't normally done that. It is a high risk, high reward. Absolutely, we could wind up with none of these targets. It absolutely doesn't mean GMac is at fault though. It is just plain tough to get guys like these. I suspect we will be happy at the end of the process. Syracuse has too much to offer to get completely frozen out.
As I mentioned previously my next door neighbor is a prominent AAU coach. Told me Quade verballed to Gmac...
We talked about this about a year ago - the 17 class represents quite a shift in recruiting for Syracuse in going after basically all Top 50 and even Top 20 type guys. We haven't normally done that. It is a high risk, high reward. Absolutely, we could wind up with none of these targets. It absolutely doesn't mean GMac is at fault though. It is just plain tough to get guys like these. I suspect we will be happy at the end of the process. Syracuse has too much to offer to get completely frozen out.
Jay Wright is an excellent coach, with a NC, at a good academic school, in a beautiful place located within a three hour radius of the best basketball talent on earth. Nova also just got something like a $20 mil donation to renovate their arena. That program is only going to become more formidable.
So, you are saying they were gone before the dynasty was really established?Brissett & Sidibe are not top 50 guys and look like they will be the long term anchors of the class, like Scoop & Rick were 10 years ago. The top 25 guys in that class were both gone by the time the train really got rolling.
funny how the real <> was established after they leftSo, you are saying they were gone before the dynasty was really established?
Does it? I mean all of these guys are smack dab in the middle of traditional Syracuse recruiting areas. Even Preston is on the radar mostly because he's an Oak Hill guy. Syracuse isn't just jumping after some kid in OK or Chicago because he's top-25....the 17 class represents quite a shift in recruiting for Syracuse...
Does it? I mean all of these guys are smack dab in the middle of traditional Syracuse recruiting areas. Even Preston is on the radar mostly because he's an Oak Hill guy. Syracuse isn't just jumping after some kid in OK or Chicago because he's top-25.
Should SU end up with a class of Quade, Brissett, and Bourma, that's pretty much a standard SU class in terms of ranked prospects. If by April of 2017, it's Quade, Bamba, Walker/Diallo, Brissett, and Bourma ... well hell, that would represent a change. And as far as anyone is talking, it's looking a lot like the former than the latter.
Does it? I mean all of these guys are smack dab in the middle of traditional Syracuse recruiting areas. Even Preston is on the radar mostly because he's an Oak Hill guy. Syracuse isn't just jumping after some kid in OK or Chicago because he's top-25.
Should SU end up with a class of Quade, Brissett, and Bourma, that's pretty much a standard SU class in terms of ranked prospects. If by April of 2017, it's Quade, Bamba, Walker/Diallo, Brissett, and Bourma ... well hell, that would represent a change. And as far as anyone is talking, it's looking a lot like the former than the latter.
That doesn't indicate that SU has changed anything ... only that the best recruits in our traditional territories are excellent this class and have attracted the top-2 recruiting juggernauts.I mean we're basically going up against UK and Duke for every single guy we've targeted.
I think it's a change. I mean we're basically going up against UK and Duke for every single guy we've targeted. How often has that happened?