bnoro Lurker Joined Aug 15, 2011 Messages 13,175 Like 43,343 Jan 8, 2014 #26 retro44 said: collier and I believe he was Rated around 10-11 on TOS I was wrong...sorry he was 12th Expand... Oh man imagine if we gave that bust 44... Exactly the reason why the number should stay retired.
retro44 said: collier and I believe he was Rated around 10-11 on TOS I was wrong...sorry he was 12th Expand... Oh man imagine if we gave that bust 44... Exactly the reason why the number should stay retired.
Van111 Starter Joined Jan 24, 2012 Messages 1,119 Like 411 Jan 8, 2014 #27 bnoro said: Oh man imagine if we gave that bust 44... Exactly the reason why the number should stay retired. Expand... That would be the risk with any player giving it on potential I would guess.
bnoro said: Oh man imagine if we gave that bust 44... Exactly the reason why the number should stay retired. Expand... That would be the risk with any player giving it on potential I would guess.
Van111 Starter Joined Jan 24, 2012 Messages 1,119 Like 411 Jan 8, 2014 #28 retro44 said: collier and I believe he was Rated around 10-11 on TOS I was wrong...sorry he was 12th Expand... Wow, he was rated that high? Bust for sure then.
retro44 said: collier and I believe he was Rated around 10-11 on TOS I was wrong...sorry he was 12th Expand... Wow, he was rated that high? Bust for sure then.