Have to think Eli became even more valuable after today. | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com

Have to think Eli became even more valuable after today.

I think Alex Smith makes more sense for the Jags. With their defense, they need a guy who places a premium on protecting the ball. Smith is also younger, and probably better. He has a ceiling on how good he can be, but i'm really not sure how good Eli is now anyway
 
I get you like Eli but he is not above average now.
How can we judge? Marshall and obj were out much of the year, SS seemingly never played at 100%. And the giants oline/run game was awful.

Eli was a sacrificial lamb and the giants general management had their knives ready
 
I think Alex Smith makes more sense for the Jags. With their defense, they need a guy who places a premium on protecting the ball. Smith is also younger, and probably better. He has a ceiling on how good he can be, but i'm really not sure how good Eli is now anyway

I agree.

I also want the Giants to keep Eli, draft Darnold (if he's available; I've beaten this to death) and let Eli help 1) get us back to the playoffs and 2) make the transition with a new coach easier.

He's not great, but he's still pretty good.
 
I think Alex Smith makes more sense for the Jags. With their defense, they need a guy who places a premium on protecting the ball. Smith is also younger, and probably better. He has a ceiling on how good he can be, but i'm really not sure how good Eli is now anyway
Cousins isn’t worth the money.
He is good but not worth making one of the highest paid players in the league.
Smith will have a market in Arizona, Buffalo, Jacksonville,Denver all in the market for QBs.

Eli has the postseason success though.
 
I agree.

I also want the Giants to keep Eli, draft Darnold (if he's available; I've beaten this to death) and let Eli help 1) get us back to the playoffs and 2) make the transition with a new coach easier.

He's not great, but he's still pretty good.

For me, I think if you draft a guy at QB, you should play him. So while i think Eli might still be ok, if they took Rosen or Darnold or whoever, I'd just hand it over to him. I think the best way to learn is to play.
 
But Kraft and Brady...2 KNOWN LIARS AND CHEATS...told us everything is hunkydory up there???

No statement from BB yet, interesting.

Why don't you include BB among the cheaters? He's worse than the other two.
 
For me, I think if you draft a guy at QB, you should play him. So while i think Eli might still be ok, if they took Rosen or Darnold or whoever, I'd just hand it over to him. I think the best way to learn is to play.

I would usually agree, but Darnold is very young. I think another year of Eli isn't terrible. He's also good with the NYC media, which I think would help insulate the new QB and new coach.
 
I would usually agree, but Darnold is very young. I think another year of Eli isn't terrible. He's also good with the NYC media, which I think would help insulate the new QB and new coach.

If anything, I think the age makes it more of a thing, he needs the reps. (Man, he is kinda young, wont turn 21 till June)

Very good point on Eli with the media though. Every situation is different, I grant that
 
but if you’d take him at 4 or someone else would at 2 or 3...and u don’t care which QB you get, u remove all doubt, get the RB, thus denying everyone else a shot, then u get back in QB pool.

What if the Giants think Webb is better than all them and are set wiTh Eli for a year and take Barkley at 2? Then the browns are flucked.

The browns have a unique situation this year, this is how id play it.

Take the RB off the board and then let the draft start with you picking 3...

It would be kind of weird to not care which QB you take. I'd have to believe most teams would desire one over the other and not be indifferent.
 
Fournette and Elliot are back to back 4s.

It’s a gamble only the browns can make, if they don’t...they lose.

I mean, it’s the browns...

Would you rather have Fournette/Elliott or Wentz/Goff? IF you believe the QB is a franchise stud then you take the QB. No brainer.
 
Why don't you include BB among the cheaters? He's worse than the other two.
Because he’s not involved in this cover up.

Nor was he when Brady ordered the balls to be deflated.
 
It would be kind of weird to not care which QB you take. I'd have to believe most teams would desire one over the other and not be indifferent.
Yeah, but all the QBs suck.
 
Would you rather have Fournette/Elliott or Wentz/Goff? IF you believe the QB is a franchise stud then you take the QB. No brainer.
In that scenario, yes.

But as I said earlier, I don’t think there is.

But to my Giants credit, they have the spot the browns would need for that QB/Barkley guarantee.

If they don’t have a QB conviction or like say Mayfield...take Barkley.
 
Because he’s not involved in this cover up.

Nor was he when Brady ordered the balls to be deflated.

He runs the operation. How about Spygate?
 
In that scenario, yes.

But as I said earlier, I don’t think there is.

But to my Giants credit, they have the spot the browns would need for that QB/Barkley guarantee.

If they don’t have a QB conviction or like say Mayfield...take Barkley.

Gotcha. I thought further back you suggested using the 4th pick to take a QB.
 
Well then don't even bother drafting one.
Gotcha. I thought further back you suggested using the 4th pick to take a QB.
You’re reading, bu you’re not understanding.

I did say take a QB at 4...If they all grade out equal to them, then do the Barkley scenario.

I’m just laying out ideas where it makes sense for them take Barkley 1.

What if Rosen also says he never will sign with the Browns?

I love that everyone is having heart attack over some outside the box thinking for this completely unique scenario.

And they already passed on Goff and Wentz, they might repeat that again here.
 
You’re reading, bu you’re not understanding.

I did say take a QB at 4...If they all grade out equal to them, then do the Barkley scenario.

I’m just laying out ideas where it makes sense for them take Barkley 1.

What if Rosen also says he never will sign with the Browns?

I love that everyone is having heart attack over some outside the box thinking for this completely unique scenario.

And they already passed on Goff and Wentz, they might repeat that again here.

No heart attacks here, Kaiser. I had one a few weeks ago in LA when Wentz went down.

The QB is more important than the RB. Every. Single. Time.

If you love one of the two QBs enough to draft at #4 then you don't risk him not being there. You take him at #1. And if you don't love him that much (which may be plausible) then don't bother with either pick.
 
No heart attacks here, Kaiser. I had one a few weeks ago in LA when Wentz went down.

The QB is more important than the RB. Every. Single. Time.

If you love one of the two QBs enough to draft at #4 then you don't risk him not being there. You take him at #1. And if you don't love him that much (which may be plausible) then don't bother with either pick.
I get the NFL is a QB league.

I used to get banned regularly from the site over arguing that Cuse had no QB and offense, as so is college,

I was looking at the point charts and figuring out ways for the browns to maximize their picks without giving up any.

The best way, is to take Barkley 1, provided they aren’t 100% sold on a QB. There is then no sense jumping up to 2, otherwise just take your QB 1. To get the Giants 2 would be their 4 and 2, 2s. To get the Colts?...1, 2 and maybe a 5.

All fun and interesting debate.




I’m just going nuts over who the damn coach will be.

McDaniels was done to titans before Saturday?? Or maybe the Colts??

Am I to get ready for Schurmer and Dorsey?? Spags?? If it’s Schwartz, who the hell will run the O?
 
I get the NFL is a QB league.

I used to get banned regularly from the site over arguing that Cuse had no QB and offense, as so is college,

I was looking at the point charts and figuring out ways for the browns to maximize their picks without giving up any.

The best way, is to take Barkley 1, provided they aren’t 100% sold on a QB. There is then no sense jumping up to 2, otherwise just take your QB 1. To get the Giants 2 would be their 4 and 2, 2s. To get the Colts?...1, 2 and maybe a 5.

All fun and interesting debate.




I’m just going nuts over who the damn coach will be.

McDaniels was done to titans before Saturday?? Or maybe the Colts??

Am I to get ready for Schurmer and Dorsey?? Spags?? If it’s Schwartz, who the hell will run the O?
Who is Belichick going to hire for the Giants?
You can’t hire anyone till after the SB.
 
Who is Belichick going to hire for the Giants?
You can’t hire anyone till after the SB.
Ha!!

No smoke as of yet regarding the greatest of all out clauses being in place...
 
Ha!!

No smoke as of yet regarding the greatest of all out clauses being in place...
He doesn’t have an out clause.
Giants can hire Belichick but they would need to give compensation.
Belichick is the President, GM, and HC.
He can go to Big Blue but you guys would send multiple draft picks.
 
He doesn’t have an out clause.
Giants can hire Belichick but they would need to give compensation.
Belichick is the President, GM, and HC.
He can go to Big Blue but you guys would send multiple draft picks.

I actually don't know, I assume he doesn't have an out, but I was doing some reading after all this came out; it seems like the details of his contract are very hard to come by.
 
I actually don't know, I assume he doesn't have an out, but I was doing some reading after all this came out; it seems like the details of his contract are very hard to come by.
I’d say 5 people know what his contract is.

Bill
His agent
Mara
Gettleman
And Kraft probably thinks he knows, but until his lawyers go over it again, he won’t know for sure.
 
I’d say 5 people know what his contract is.

Bill
His agent
Mara
Gettleman
And Kraft probably thinks he knows, but until his lawyers go over it again, he won’t know for sure.
Yeah Gettleman really wants Belichick.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,390
Messages
4,889,253
Members
5,996
Latest member
meierscreek

Online statistics

Members online
378
Guests online
1,773
Total visitors
2,151


...
Top Bottom