House Settlement Approved | Page 8 | Syracusefan.com
.

House Settlement Approved

What's the crux here? Treating a collective like a business just means there has to be a showing of a legitimate measurable business purpose, right? "We want to pool money and pay guys so they play for us" is not a valid business reason regardless of how the collective is "treated". I really really want to see collectives eliminated entirely, and hope that the eventual NCAA legislation outlaws them.
I think they've agreed that there can be collectives, and NILs from collectives are not automatically not qualified. But what will be qualified is probably what they're still negotiating. I'd guess that pure pay for play will not be allowed. But what probably will be allowed are activities that the collective sponsors where the athlete is paid for performing some services, such as signing autographs and maybe giving a speech. The harder one will be whether they can be paid to just appear. For that I'd think there may need to be some other business purpose of the event. Maybe raising money for a charitable organization. The hardest one will be if they allow appearance fees for an event that is solely to raise money for the Collective. I'd guess that IF there is legislation, a BIG IF, it might reign in collectives but I doubt it would be eliminated. The biggest roadblock to legislation might be insistence by Democrats that there be collective bargaining, whether or not the athletes are treated as employees.
 
I think they've agreed that there can be collectives, and NILs from collectives are not automatically not qualified. But what will be qualified is probably what they're still negotiating. I'd guess that pure pay for play will not be allowed. But what probably will be allowed are activities that the collective sponsors where the athlete is paid for performing some services, such as signing autographs and maybe giving a speech. The harder one will be whether they can be paid to just appear. For that I'd think there may need to be some other business purpose of the event. Maybe raising money for a charitable organization. The hardest one will be if they allow appearance fees for an event that is solely to raise money for the Collective. I'd guess that IF there is legislation, a BIG IF, it might reign in collectives but I doubt it would be eliminated. The biggest roadblock to legislation might be insistence by Democrats that there be collective bargaining, whether or not the athletes are treated as employees.
It’s a cluster if they change the rules again.
 
I think the current negotiations are about "refining" them. Some might call it "clarifying" them.
The select top programs don’t want to be restricted is the issue. They have lots more cash and want to be free to use NIL as a pay for play supplement. Everyone else wants a cap. A soft cap was the best outcome for most schools like a Syracuse.
 


Don’t let this distract you from the fact that Hector is going to be running three Honda Civics with spoon engines, and on top of that, he just went into Harry’s and bought three T66 turbos with NOS, and a Motec system exhaust.
 
FWIW2U. This, regarding how the Tarheels (gag) are scoping out finding the money...

UNC ATHLETICS FOR SALE —-Place your bid here!
“UNC-Chapel Hill will need to find $20.5 million to pay student athletes for the first time now that a judge has signed off on the House vs. NCAA settlement. Now they just have to find that money.
Reporter Matt Hartman obtained internal documents that show various ideas the Tar Heels have explored to fund the new revenue-sharing model. That includes:
Naming rights for Carmichael Arena: $500,000
Naming rights for Boshamer Stadium: $500,000
Naming rights for Kenan Stadium: $2 million-$5 million
Naming rights for Dean Dome: $2 million
Basketball jersey ads: $3 million
Football uniform ads: $1 million
Baseball or women’s basketball jersey ads: $250,000
New basketball arena: $24.6 million
 
FWIW2U. This, regarding how the Tarheels (gag) are scoping out finding the money...

UNC ATHLETICS FOR SALE —-Place your bid here!
“UNC-Chapel Hill will need to find $20.5 million to pay student athletes for the first time now that a judge has signed off on the House vs. NCAA settlement. Now they just have to find that money.
Reporter Matt Hartman obtained internal documents that show various ideas the Tar Heels have explored to fund the new revenue-sharing model. That includes:
Naming rights for Carmichael Arena: $500,000
Naming rights for Boshamer Stadium: $500,000
Naming rights for Kenan Stadium: $2 million-$5 million
Naming rights for Dean Dome: $2 million
Basketball jersey ads: $3 million
Football uniform ads: $1 million
Baseball or women’s basketball jersey ads: $250,000
New basketball arena: $24.6 million
Uniforms ads - another significant advancement in the destruction of college athletics as we used to know them.
 
FWIW2U. This, regarding how the Tarheels (gag) are scoping out finding the money...

UNC ATHLETICS FOR SALE —-Place your bid here!
“UNC-Chapel Hill will need to find $20.5 million to pay student athletes for the first time now that a judge has signed off on the House vs. NCAA settlement. Now they just have to find that money.
Reporter Matt Hartman obtained internal documents that show various ideas the Tar Heels have explored to fund the new revenue-sharing model. That includes:
Naming rights for Carmichael Arena: $500,000
Naming rights for Boshamer Stadium: $500,000
Naming rights for Kenan Stadium: $2 million-$5 million
Naming rights for Dean Dome: $2 million
Basketball jersey ads: $3 million
Football uniform ads: $1 million
Baseball or women’s basketball jersey ads: $250,000
New basketball arena: $24.6 million
Naming rights for the love child between Belichick and his GF: $1M.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
173,915
Messages
5,120,726
Members
6,074
Latest member
CheerMom12

Online statistics

Members online
171
Guests online
920
Total visitors
1,091


...
Top Bottom