newmexicuse
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,635
- Like
- 8,012
I am seeing a lot of it in various threads. Frank was a huge part of this tournament run. It is our D up top that is particularly tough. Well who does everybody think plays next to Ty ??
So, the kid could have shot better. He had 8 boards and 5 assists. That shows heart and effort. Maybe, he felt his shot was off, so he didn't force things & only took six.
Our O was efficient tonight - we shot 49%. We had strong entry passes to the high post, we had some effective lobs. Who do you think had a big part in orchestrating all of that ?
people complain about a few stray lobs - Frank only had three of sixteen TOs.
Personally, I think too many TOs was the big deciding factor, but that wasn't any more on Frank than it was on the team as a whole.
Some posters here need to grow up and appreciate what a remarkable post-season turn-around we had with an undermanned, under talented squad.
So, the kid could have shot better. He had 8 boards and 5 assists. That shows heart and effort. Maybe, he felt his shot was off, so he didn't force things & only took six.
Our O was efficient tonight - we shot 49%. We had strong entry passes to the high post, we had some effective lobs. Who do you think had a big part in orchestrating all of that ?
people complain about a few stray lobs - Frank only had three of sixteen TOs.
Personally, I think too many TOs was the big deciding factor, but that wasn't any more on Frank than it was on the team as a whole.
Some posters here need to grow up and appreciate what a remarkable post-season turn-around we had with an undermanned, under talented squad.