I work as a prosecutor & make decisions every day that affect people's lives. I try my best to make those decisions based on all of the facts of each case. The only consistency is that each decision is based on the same goal -- fairness to all involved. Often what seems inconsistent to the public is due to the simple reason that they do not and can not have access to all the facts. Do I think in hindsight I've been 100% right with every decision? No, but it's the nature of the system that judgments have to be made.
In this case, I'll defer to HCDM's superior knowledge of all of the facts. I'll accept that missing 15 practices was an appropriate punishment. And if 15 practices is the difference between success & failure, then perhaps our young QB prospect wasn't much of a prospect after all.
Finally, so long as the staff isn't giving up on a player, then being tough on them is not a bad thing so long as there is a second chance available. Personally, I'm happy to see there is a different approach taken at SU then at some of the well-known football factories. I believe it's possible to be successful and simultaneously stay true to your principles.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk