I don't believe for 1 second that people want Hunt to start (including myself) because for 3 minutes of playing time in the NW game. I think it's because we have all seen ridiculously bad QB play in our time as fans...Patterson, Robinson, Fields, Allen so far, etc...
I think most fans are in 1 of 2 camps. The first being that Hunt can't possibly be any worse than 55% completions, 6 interceptions, 5 batted balls and 6 or 8 throws out of bounds. The 2nd being that we should give the young man some run because he has 2 more years to compete and possibly start along with the fact that he is a threat to run. If we are going to throw the season away because of bad QB play it should be to someone who might help the program the next year or 2. We really don't know what he can do our starter is in the bottom 10% of the nation.
I am sure there are more "camps" to go one way or the other.
Remember, we weren't the ones that said it was Neck and Neck battle for the QB spot all pre-season, the coaches were. If it was so close, why start the kid that has performed so badly in actual games for the next one?
If that closeness was all falsehood, then the coaches made their own beds to build up Hunt to something he is not and have brought the current QB controversy on themselves. And the pressure and consequences that go with it. Maybe it was to promote competition, maybe it was to throw Ped State off. Not sure if there is any good reason.
As a fan, I can only go by what I can see.