It's great until a team beats you and/or knocks you out of the NCAAT because of the good play of a grad transfer.I'm loving the grad transfer thing. This has been an exciting time with Gillon and possibly White coming on board!
As with many well-intentioned rules that get exploited, the spirit does not match the reality.
I'm generally in favor of choice as much as possible. And I agree with you that the spirit / intent of this rule was designed to benefit the players. But in actual practice, it has emerged as a feeder mechanism for P5 schools gobbling up prospects from lesser programs. Many [most? all?] coaching staffs have lists of players who are fifth year grad transfer candidates--it just seems unseemly to me to actively recruit players on other teams' rosters.
If they did that, they should be sued right out of coaching.I assume coaches will "smarten up" and basically try to make it difficult for guys who redshirted to graduate in four years so they can't grad transfer out.
I assume coaches will "smarten up" and basically try to make it difficult for guys who redshirted to graduate in four years so they can't grad transfer out.
People that hate the 1 and done and love this...could you be more transparent?
That's a very good point. However, the impact of 1-and-done is much different than the impact of the 5 year players changing schools for one year of graduate studies. Are you acquiescing to the idea CBB needs to be valued in itself? Or are you just interested in pointing out a mild hypocrisy?
Not interested in having this back and forth if you don't understand it. Thanks.